Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 322
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 30, 1961
DocketNo. 65105; protest 58/23006-10299 (Chicago)
StatusPublished

This text of 46 Cust. Ct. 322 (Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 322 (cusc 1961).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of manufactures of leather, other than reptile leather, to wit, leather picture frames, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Cust. Ct. 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-salm-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1961.