Empire Findings Co. v. United States
48 Cust. Ct. 334
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Empire Findings Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 44 Cust. Ct. 21 →
United States Customs Court·Decided February 13, 1962·No. No. 66451; protests 59/2229, 59/17170, and 60/1130 (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of percussion hammers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United States (46 Cust. Ct. 68, C.D. 2235), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Empire Findings Co. v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 334 (cusc 1962).
48 Cust. Ct. 334 (Empire Findings Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United States
46 Cust. Ct. 68 (U.S. Customs Court, 1961)