Empire Findings Co. v. United States

49 Cust. Ct. 212, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1098
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Empire Findings Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 44 Cust. Ct. 21
United States Customs Court·Decided August 30, 1962·No. No. 66998; protests 60/21214, 60/24265, and 60/28989 (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of percussion hammers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United States (46 Cust. Ct. 68, C.D. 2235), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Empire Findings Co. v. United States, 49 Cust. Ct. 212, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1098 (cusc 1962).

49 Cust. Ct. 212 (Empire Findings Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United States
46 Cust. Ct. 68 (U.S. Customs Court, 1961)