Arsdi v. Holder

659 F.3d 925, 455 F. App'x 731
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 24, 2011
Docket10-72147
StatusUnpublished

This text of 659 F.3d 925 (Arsdi v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arsdi v. Holder, 659 F.3d 925, 455 F. App'x 731 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Alazar Getachew Arsdi is a native and citizen of Ethiopia, who is removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) for having committed an aggravated felony. He petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his claim for deferral of removal pursuant to the United Nations Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny Arsdi’s petition.

“[Administrative findings of fact are conclusive unless any reasonable adjudica *732 tor would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (emphasis added). It was Arsdi’s burden to show “a chance greater than fifty percent that he will be tortured if removed.” Hamoui v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 821, 827 (9th Cir.2004).

The record in this case does not compel a conclusion that Arsdi will more likely than not be tortured. He has produced some evidence that torture sometimes occurs in Ethiopian prisons. But because he has not even shown that he will more likely than not be detained if returned to Ethiopia, he clearly has not shown that he will more likely than not be tortured.

DENIED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Arsdi also filed for asylum and withholding of removal. His appeal regarding those claims is disposed of in a concurrently filed opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamoui v. Ashcroft
389 F.3d 821 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
659 F.3d 925, 455 F. App'x 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arsdi-v-holder-ca9-2011.