Arana v. Ochsner Health Plan

319 F.3d 205, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 661, 2002 WL 31951275
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 16, 2003
DocketNo. 01-30922
StatusPublished

This text of 319 F.3d 205 (Arana v. Ochsner Health Plan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arana v. Ochsner Health Plan, 319 F.3d 205, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 661, 2002 WL 31951275 (5th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
319 F.3d 205, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 661, 2002 WL 31951275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arana-v-ochsner-health-plan-ca5-2003.