Arana v. Ochsner Health Plan

319 F.3d 205, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 661, 2002 WL 31951275

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arana v. Ochsner Health Plan. Read the opinion of the Court — 338 F.3d 433 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 16, 2003·No. No. 01-30922·Published

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

Arana v. Ochsner Health Plan, 319 F.3d 205, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 661, 2002 WL 31951275 (5th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

319 F.3d 205 (Arana v. Ochsner Health Plan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.