Application of David Tanner

343 F.2d 1018, 52 C.C.P.A. 1307
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals·Decided April 30, 1965·No. Patent Appeal 7514·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals dated March 31, 1964.

Appellant has moved to correct diminution of the record by the addition of a terminal disclaimer filed by applicant in the Patent Office and recorded therein on November 9,1964. The motion is denied without prejudice. The case is remanded to the Patent Office Board of Appeals to determine the effect of said terminal disclaimer on the issues presented by the appeal, taking into consideration In re Robeson, 331 F.2d 610, 51 CCPA 1271, decided May 14, 1964, and In re Kaye, 332 F.2d 816, 51 CCPA 1465, decided June 11, 1964, and to take such further action as it may deem appropriate. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application of David Tanner, 343 F.2d 1018, 52 C.C.P.A. 1307 (ccpa 1965).

343 F.2d 1018 (Application of David Tanner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Deters
515 F.2d 1152 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1975)
Application of Frederick A. Purdy
393 F.2d 1010 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1968)
Application of Edgar G. Heyl
379 F.2d 1018 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1967)
Application of Jesse T. Dunn and Alex E. Brodhag, Jr
349 F.2d 433 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1965)
Application of David Tanner
343 F.2d 1018 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1965)