FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 13
Decision on appeal
35 U.S.C. § 144
Title35 — Patents
Chapter13 — REVIEW OF PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE DECISIONS
This text of 35 U.S.C. § 144 (Decision on appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 144.
Text
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall review the decision from which an appeal is taken on the record before the Patent and Trademark Office. Upon its determination the court shall issue to the Director its mandate and opinion, which shall be entered of record in the Patent and Trademark Office and shall govern the further proceedings in the case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. Norton
203 F.3d 1305 (Federal Circuit, 2000)
Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumuller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred Bander
379 F.2d 990 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1967)
In Re Anita Dembiczak and Benson Zinbarg
175 F.3d 994 (Federal Circuit, 1999)
Application of Rudolf Wiechert
370 F.2d 927 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1967)
Jerry Gechter, Robert L. Pokress, Jeffrey A. Fried, and G. Wayne Andrews v. Wayne A. Davidson and Diana S. Winter
116 F.3d 1454 (Federal Circuit, 1997)
In Re Comiskey
554 F.3d 967 (Federal Circuit, 2009)
Application of Frederick C. Foster
343 F.2d 980 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1965)
Francis G. Brown v. The United States
396 F.2d 989 (Court of Claims, 1968)
The Durox Company v. Duron Paint Manufacturing Company, Inc.
320 F.2d 882 (Fourth Circuit, 1963)
Hyatt v. Kappos
625 F.3d 1320 (Federal Circuit, 2010)
Application of William L. Hartop, Jr., and Edward P. Brandes
311 F.2d 249 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1962)
Michael S. Brown, Joseph L. Goldstein, and Yuval Reiss v. Mariano Barbacid and Veeraswamy Manne
276 F.3d 1327 (Federal Circuit, 2002)
Application of Arthur v. Hughes
345 F.2d 184 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1965)
In re Fielder
471 F.2d 640 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1973)
Application of Milton E. Herr
377 F.2d 610 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1967)
In Re Aoyama
656 F.3d 1293 (Federal Circuit, 2011)
In re Clemens
622 F.2d 1029 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1980)
Velsicol Chemical Corporation v. Monsanto Company
579 F.2d 1038 (Seventh Circuit, 1978)
Application of Lepage's Incorporated (A Subsidiary of the Papercraft Corporation, and Assignee of Johnson & Johnson)
312 F.2d 455 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1963)
Application of Kenneth B. Cofer
354 F.2d 664 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1966)
Source Credit
History
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 802; Pub. L. 93–596, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §163(a)(7), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 49; Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §414(a), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3363; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §62 (R.S. 4914).
Language is changed and the last sentence of the corresponding section of existing statute omitted as superfluous; such a sentence does not appear in the present civil action section, 35 U.S.C. 63 and in either case the validity of the patent may be questioned.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below.
1999—Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted "Director" for "Commissioner".
1984—Pub. L. 98–620 substituted provisions requiring the court to review the decision on the record before the Patent and Trademark Office and upon reaching a determination to issue its mandate and opinion to the Commissioner for provisions which required the court, on petition, to hear and determine the appeal on the evidence produced before the Patent and Trademark Office (with the decision to be confined to the points set forth in the reasons of appeal) and, upon its determination, to return to the Commissioner a certificate of its proceedings and decision.
1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit" for "Court of Customs and Patent Appeals".
1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office" in two places.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 applicable to proceedings pending in the Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 8, 1984, and to appeals pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on such date, see section 414(c) of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as a note under section 142 of this title.
Effective Date of 1982 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Effective Date of 1975 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §62 (R.S. 4914).
Language is changed and the last sentence of the corresponding section of existing statute omitted as superfluous; such a sentence does not appear in the present civil action section, 35 U.S.C. 63 and in either case the validity of the patent may be questioned.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below.
1999—Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted "Director" for "Commissioner".
1984—Pub. L. 98–620 substituted provisions requiring the court to review the decision on the record before the Patent and Trademark Office and upon reaching a determination to issue its mandate and opinion to the Commissioner for provisions which required the court, on petition, to hear and determine the appeal on the evidence produced before the Patent and Trademark Office (with the decision to be confined to the points set forth in the reasons of appeal) and, upon its determination, to return to the Commissioner a certificate of its proceedings and decision.
1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit" for "Court of Customs and Patent Appeals".
1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office" in two places.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 applicable to proceedings pending in the Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 8, 1984, and to appeals pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on such date, see section 414(c) of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as a note under section 142 of this title.
Effective Date of 1982 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Effective Date of 1975 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/144.