Allen v. Allen

Supreme Court of Vermont

Allen v. Allen

641 A.2d 1332, 161 Vt. 526, 1994 Vt. LEXIS 37

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedApril 15, 1994

Docket92-220

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 641 A.2d 1332 (Allen v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen v. Allen, 641 A.2d 1332, 161 Vt. 526, 1994 Vt. LEXIS 37 (Vt. 1994).

Pincite

Opinions

Allen, C J.

The issue on appeal is whether the family court erred in ruling that the postnuptial agreement bars the plaintiff from collecting interest on the note. That is the only issue [527]*527briefed and argued by the parties, and the resolution in this Court should be confined to an answer to that question. Because I agree with my associates that the trial court’s conclusion was erroneous in that respect, I would reverse and remand the matter for such further proceedings as the parties and court deem appropriate.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen, C J.

The issue on appeal is whether the family court erred in ruling that the postnuptial agreement bars the plaintiff from collecting interest on the note. That is the only issue [527]*527briefed and argued by the parties, and the resolution in this Court should be confined to an answer to that question. Because I agree with my associates that the trial court’s conclusion was erroneous in that respect, I would reverse and remand the matter for such further proceedings as the parties and court deem appropriate.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

641 A.2d 1332, 161 Vt. 526, 1994 Vt. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-allen-vt-1994.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack