Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter
Opinion
Order entered February 14, 2020
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00903-CV
ALBERT LUTTERODT, Appellant
V.
DAVID J. POTTER AND JACKSON M. POTTER, Appellees
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-01182-D ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s February 11, 2020 motion requesting a ninety-day stay of
the appeal. This is appellant’s second motion to stay. In the first motion, appellant sought, in
part, a ten-day extension of time to file his opening brief. We granted the extension and ordered
the opening brief be filed no later than February 13, 2020. Having previously granted two other
extensions totaling sixty-eight days, we also cautioned appellant that further extension requests
would be disfavored.
We construe appellant’s second motion to stay as an extension motion and GRANT it to
the extent that we ORDER appellant to file his brief by March 16, 2020. We strongly caution
appellant that a failure to file a brief by this date may result in the dismissal of the appeal for
want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b),(c).
/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter (Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.