Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 14, 2020·No. 05-19-00903-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered February 14, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00903-CV

ALBERT LUTTERODT, Appellant V.

DAVID J. POTTER AND JACKSON M. POTTER, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-01182-D ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s February 11, 2020 motion requesting a ninety-day stay of

the appeal. This is appellant’s second motion to stay. In the first motion, appellant sought, in part, a ten-day extension of time to file his opening brief. We granted the extension and ordered the opening brief be filed no later than February 13, 2020. Having previously granted two other extensions totaling sixty-eight days, we also cautioned appellant that further extension requests would be disfavored.

We construe appellant’s second motion to stay as an extension motion and GRANT it to the extent that we ORDER appellant to file his brief by March 16, 2020. We strongly caution appellant that a failure to file a brief by this date may result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b),(c).

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter (Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.