Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter
This text of Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter (Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered September 10, 2019
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00903-CV
ALBERT LUTTERODT, Appellant
V.
DAVID J. POTTER AND JACKSON M. POTTER, Appellees
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-01182-D
ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s September 6, 2019 first motion for extension of time to
file his opening brief. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6, an appellant’s
opening brief is due within thirty days after the later of the date the clerk’s record was filed or
the date the reporter’s record was filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). While the clerk’s record has
been filed, the reporter’s record has not. Accordingly, we DENY the motion as premature.
/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-lutterodt-v-david-j-potter-and-jackson-m-potter-texapp-2019.