Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter
Opinion
Order entered November 27, 2019
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00903-CV
ALBERT LUTTERODT, Appellant
V.
DAVID J. POTTER AND JACKSON M. POTTER, Appellees
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-01182-D
ORDER On November 15, 2019, we denied appellant’s second motion requesting
supplementation of the record because, other than audiotapes that are not judicial records, it
failed to describe specifically the items requested and the relevance of the missing items to the
appeal. Before the Court is appellant’s November 19, 2019 response and request for extension
of time to file his opening brief. He explains “he believes the records are incomplete, and the
critical Court #4 transcripts are missing.”
To the extent appellant requests again to supplement the record, we DENY the motion as
he fails to specify what records are missing and our review of the record shows the record of the
only hearing that occurred in the trial court, on April 15, 2019, has been filed. To the extent he seeks an extension, we GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant's opening brief be filed no
later than December 30, 2019.
/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter (Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.