Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 27, 2019·No. 05-19-00903-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered November 27, 2019

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00903-CV

ALBERT LUTTERODT, Appellant

V.

DAVID J. POTTER AND JACKSON M. POTTER, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-01182-D

ORDER On November 15, 2019, we denied appellant’s second motion requesting

supplementation of the record because, other than audiotapes that are not judicial records, it

failed to describe specifically the items requested and the relevance of the missing items to the

appeal. Before the Court is appellant’s November 19, 2019 response and request for extension

of time to file his opening brief. He explains “he believes the records are incomplete, and the

critical Court #4 transcripts are missing.”

To the extent appellant requests again to supplement the record, we DENY the motion as

he fails to specify what records are missing and our review of the record shows the record of the

only hearing that occurred in the trial court, on April 15, 2019, has been filed. To the extent he seeks an extension, we GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant's opening brief be filed no

later than December 30, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter (Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.