Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 29, 2020·No. 05-19-00903-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered January 29, 2020

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00903-CV

ALBERT LUTTERODT, Appellant

V.

DAVID J. POTTER AND JACKSON M. POTTER, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-01182-D

ORDER Appellant’s opening brief in this appeal was due January 27, 2020, following two

extensions. Rather than filing the brief, appellant has filed a motion to stay. Appellant explains

he has been seeking an attorney to represent him in this appeal but has not been successful. He

asks to be included in the Pro Bono Program or alternatively, for “a 10 day limited extension of

time” to file his opening brief.

We note appellant indicated in his docketing statement that he wished to be considered

for inclusion in the Pro Bono Program, and the Pro Bono Program was forwarded that

information. Accordingly, we GRANT the motion to the extent we ORDER appellant’s brief be

filed no later than February 13, 2020. We caution appellant that further extension requests will

be disfavored. /s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter (Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.