Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter
Opinion
Order entered January 29, 2020
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00903-CV
ALBERT LUTTERODT, Appellant V.
DAVID J. POTTER AND JACKSON M. POTTER, Appellees
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-01182-D
ORDER
Appellant’s opening brief in this appeal was due January 27, 2020, following two
extensions. Rather than filing the brief, appellant has filed a motion to stay. Appellant explains he has been seeking an attorney to represent him in this appeal but has not been successful. He asks to be included in the Pro Bono Program or alternatively, for “a 10 day limited extension of time” to file his opening brief.
We note appellant indicated in his docketing statement that he wished to be considered for inclusion in the Pro Bono Program, and the Pro Bono Program was forwarded that information. Accordingly, we GRANT the motion to the extent we ORDER appellant’s brief be filed no later than February 13, 2020. We caution appellant that further extension requests will be disfavored.
/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter (Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.