Adams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Adams v. State

360 S.W.3d 303, 2012 WL 123103, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 43

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 17, 2012

DocketED 96382

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 360 S.W.3d 303 (Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. State, 360 S.W.3d 303, 2012 WL 123103, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 43 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Tarell Adams, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-convietion relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Tarell Adams, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-convietion relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

360 S.W.3d 303, 2012 WL 123103, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack