Adams v. State

360 S.W.3d 303, 2012 WL 123103, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 43
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 17, 2012·No. ED 96382·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Tarell Adams, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-convietion relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. State, 360 S.W.3d 303, 2012 WL 123103, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 43 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

360 S.W.3d 303 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fellows v. Afshari
360 S.W.3d 303 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)