Adams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Adams v. State

420 S.W.3d 666, 2014 WL 296026, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 81

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1113 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 28, 2014·No. No. ED 99693·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Martyn Adams, appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s judgment denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Martyn Adams, appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s judgment denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b).

Adams v. State, 420 S.W.3d 666, 2014 WL 296026, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 81 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

420 S.W.3d 666 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.