Adams v. State

402 S.W.3d 157, 2013 WL 3226792, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 774
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1113
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 25, 2013·No. No. WD 75020·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Adams appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Adams sought to vacate his convictions for first degree murder, section 565.020, RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 2000, and concurrent sentences of life imprisonment without parole and life imprisonment, respectively. In his sole point on appeal, he claims that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to call two witnesses to testify that Doyne Rhoades, his co-defendant, had a motive to kill the victim. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. State, 402 S.W.3d 157, 2013 WL 3226792, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 774 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

402 S.W.3d 157 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.