Fellows v. Afshari
360 S.W.3d 303, 2012 WL 121153, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 31
Opinion
ORDER
Joseph Afshari and Afshari Enterprises, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) appeal the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict awarding damages following a default judgment against them. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fellows v. Afshari, 360 S.W.3d 303, 2012 WL 121153, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 31 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
360 S.W.3d 303 (Fellows v. Afshari) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adams v. State
360 S.W.3d 303 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)