Fellows v. Afshari

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fellows v. Afshari

360 S.W.3d 303, 2012 WL 121153, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 31

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 17, 2012

DocketED 95364

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 360 S.W.3d 303 (Fellows v. Afshari) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fellows v. Afshari, 360 S.W.3d 303, 2012 WL 121153, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 31 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Afshari and Afshari Enterprises, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) appeal the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict awarding damages following a default judgment against them. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Afshari and Afshari Enterprises, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) appeal the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict awarding damages following a default judgment against them. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

360 S.W.3d 303, 2012 WL 121153, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fellows-v-afshari-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack