Abraxis Bioscience, Inc. v. NAVINTA LLC

672 F.3d 1239, 97 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 2011, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 5006, 2011 WL 873298
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 14, 2011·No. 2009-1539·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge,

with whom LINN and DYK, Circuit Judges, join,

concurs in the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge,

with whom NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, joins,

dissents from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.

ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc was filed by Plaintiff-Appellee, and a response thereto wras invited by the court and filed by Defendanh-Appellant.

The petition for panel rehearing was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and response were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll whether to rehear the appeal en banc. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The Plaintiff-Appellee’s petition for panel rehearing is denied.

(2) The Plaintiff-Appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

(3) The mandate of the court will issue on March 21, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abraxis Bioscience, Inc. v. NAVINTA LLC, 672 F.3d 1239, 97 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 2011, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 5006, 2011 WL 873298 (Fed. Cir. 2011).

672 F.3d 1239 (Abraxis Bioscience, Inc. v. NAVINTA LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related