National Rural Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Us West Communications, Inc., Gte Telephone Operating Companies, Ameritech Operating Companies, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Maryland People's Counsel, Nynex, Pacific Bell and Nevada Bell, Bellsouth Corporation, South Central Bell and Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Alltel Service Corporation, Telephone Utilities Exchange Carrier Association, United States Telephone Association, MCI Telecommunications Corporation, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Metropolitan Fiber Systems, Inc., Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee, National Cable Television Association, Inc., International Communications Association, Tele-Communications Association, Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia, United Telecommunications, Inc., Intervenors. The Organization for the Protection and Advancement of Small Telephone Companies v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Us West Communications, Inc., Gte Telephone Operating Companies, Ameritech Operating Companies, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Maryland People's Counsel, Nynex, Pacific Bell and Nevada Bell, Bellsouth Corporation, South Central Bell and Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Alltel Service Corporation, Telephone Utilities Exchange Carrier Association, United States Telephone Association, MCI Telecommunications Corporation, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Metropolitan Fiber Systems, Inc., Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee, National Cable Television Association, Inc., International Communications Association, Tele-Communications Association, Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia, United Telecommunications, Inc., National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates, Intervenors. National Telephone Cooperative Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Us West Communications, Inc., Gte Telephone Operating Companies, Ameritech Operating Companies, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Maryland People's Counsel, Nynex, Pacific Bell and Nevada Bell, Bellsouth Corporation, South Central Bell and Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Alltel Service Corporation, Telephone Utilities Exchange Carrier Association, United States Telephone Association, MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Metropolitan Fiber Systems, Inc., Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee, National Cable Television Association, Inc., International Communications Association, Tele-Communications Association, Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia, United Telecommunications, Inc., Intervenors. MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Us West Communications, Inc., Gte Telephone Operating Companies, Ameritech Operating Companies, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Maryland People's Counsel, Nynex, Pacific Bell and Nevada Bell, Bellsouth Corporation, South Central Bell and Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Alltel Service Corporation, Telephone Utilities Exchange Carrier Association, United States Telephone Association, Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee, Bell Atlantic, Tele-Communications Association, Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia, Central Telephone Company, Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission, IntervenorsFiledMar 26, 1993Cited3× International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. Occupational Safety & Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, the Dow Chemical Company, American Petroleum Institute, National Confections Association, Chocolate Manufacturers Association, Intervenors. National Association of Manufacturers v. Occupational Safety & Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Labor, Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of the United States, Intervenor. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw, Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. Occupational Safety & Health Administration, U.S. Department of LaborFiledMar 10, 1993 Icore, Inc., City of Brookings Municipal Telephone Company, Dunnell Telephone Company, Kadoka Telephone Company, Jefferson Telephone Company, Mount Rushmore Telephone Company, North State Telephone Company, Northwest Iowa Telephone Company, Prairie Grove Telephone Company, Summit Telephone and Telegraph of Alaska, and Union Telephone Company v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, National Telephone Cooperative Association and National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., Intervenors. Icore, Inc., City of Brookings Municipal Telephone Company, Dunnell Telephone Company, Kadoka Telephone Company, Jefferson Telephone Company, Mount Rushmore Telephone Company, North State Telephone Company, Northwest Iowa Telephone Company, Prairie Grove Telephone Company, Summit Telephone and Telegraph of Alaska, and Union Telephone Company v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, National Telephone Cooperative Association and National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., IntervenorsFiledFeb 19, 1993Cited1× Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, McCarty Farms, Inc., Intervenors. McCarty Farms, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Intervenor. Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, McCarty Farms, Inc., Intervenors. McCarty Farms, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Intervenor. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, and the United States of America v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, McCarty Farms, Inc. And the State of Montana, Department of Commerce, Intervenors. McCarty Farms, Inc. And the State of Montana, Department of Commerce v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of AmericaFiledFeb 9, 1993Cited11×