United States v. Loriano

996 F.2d 424, 302 U.S. App. D.C. 158, 1993 WL 282638
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJuly 13, 1993
DocketNo. 91-3217
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 996 F.2d 424 (United States v. Loriano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Loriano, 996 F.2d 424, 302 U.S. App. D.C. 158, 1993 WL 282638 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

Prior Report: 984 F.2d 1239.

This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel. The matter is also before the court on appellant’s petition for rehearing, the response thereto and the reply. On consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED, by the Court, that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this cause is hereby reversed.

The Clerk is directed to promptly issue the court’s mandate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. May
145 F. Supp. 2d 57 (District of Columbia, 2001)
Smith v. United States
687 A.2d 1356 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
Proctor v. United States
685 A.2d 735 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
United States v. Reggie Eugene May
68 F.3d 515 (D.C. Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Daryn Purvis
21 F.3d 1128 (D.C. Circuit, 1994)
Foreman v. United States
633 A.2d 792 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
United States v. Pablo Juan Merlos
8 F.3d 48 (D.C. Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
996 F.2d 424, 302 U.S. App. D.C. 158, 1993 WL 282638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-loriano-cadc-1993.