United States v. Loriano
996 F.2d 424, 302 U.S. App. D.C. 158, 1993 WL 282638
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided July 13, 1993·No. No. 91-3217·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
JUDGMENT
Prior Report: 984 F.2d 1239.
This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel. The matter is also before the court on appellant’s petition for rehearing, the response thereto and the reply. On consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED, by the Court, that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this cause is hereby reversed.
The Clerk is directed to promptly issue the court’s mandate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Loriano, 996 F.2d 424, 302 U.S. App. D.C. 158, 1993 WL 282638 (D.C. Cir. 1993).
996 F.2d 424 (United States v. Loriano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. May
145 F. Supp. 2d 57 (District of Columbia, 2001)
Smith v. United States
687 A.2d 1356 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
Proctor v. United States
685 A.2d 735 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
United States v. Reggie Eugene May
68 F.3d 515 (D.C. Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Daryn Purvis
21 F.3d 1128 (D.C. Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Antoine D. Washington, United States of America v. Glen Early, Jr., A/K/A William Kevin Marcus
12 F.3d 1128 (D.C. Circuit, 1994)
Foreman v. United States
633 A.2d 792 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
United States v. Pablo Juan Merlos
8 F.3d 48 (D.C. Circuit, 1993)