FEDERAL · 9 U.S.C. · Chapter 1
Failure to arbitrate under agreement; petition to United States court having jurisdiction for order to compel arbitration; notice and service thereof; hearing and determination
9 U.S.C. § 4
Title9 — Arbitration
Chapter1 — GENERAL PROVISIONS
This text of 9 U.S.C. § 4 (Failure to arbitrate under agreement; petition to United States court having jurisdiction for order to compel arbitration; notice and service thereof; hearing and determination) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
9 U.S.C. § 4.
Text
A party aggrieved by the alleged failure, neglect, or refusal of another to arbitrate under a written agreement for arbitration may petition any United States district court which, save for such agreement, would have jurisdiction under title 28, in a civil action or in admiralty of the subject matter of a suit arising out of the controversy between the parties, for an order directing that such arbitration proceed in the manner provided for in such agreement. Five days' notice in writing of such application shall be served upon the party in default. Service thereof shall be made in the manner provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court shall hear the parties, and upon being satisfied that the making of the agreement for arbitration or the failure to comply therewith is not i
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRANK’S NURSERY & CRAFTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
177 F.3d 448 (Sixth Circuit, 1999)
D.A. Osguthorpe Family Partnership v. ASC Utah, Inc.
705 F.3d 1223 (Tenth Circuit, 2013)
American Heritage Life Insurance v. Orr
294 F.3d 702 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Washington
939 So. 2d 6 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2006)
Cargill Rice, Inc. v. Empresa Nicaraguense Dealimentos Basicos
25 F.3d 223 (Fourth Circuit, 1994)
Thi of New Mexico at Vida Encantada, LLC v. Lovato
848 F. Supp. 2d 1309 (D. New Mexico, 2012)
Glencore Ltd. v. Degussa Engineered Carbons L.P.
848 F. Supp. 2d 410 (S.D. New York, 2012)
Gaul v. Chrysler Financial Services Americas LLC
657 F. App'x 16 (Second Circuit, 2016)
Mcgovern v. U.S. Bank N.A.
362 F. Supp. 3d 850 (S.D. California, 2019)
Crews v. S & S Service Center Inc.
848 F. Supp. 2d 595 (E.D. Virginia, 2012)
Sanders v. Swift Transportation Co.
843 F. Supp. 2d 1033 (N.D. California, 2012)
Community State Bank v. Knox
850 F. Supp. 2d 586 (M.D. North Carolina, 2012)
Strawn v. AFC Enterprises Inc
(Fifth Circuit, 2000)
Amer Heritage Life v. Martin
(Fifth Circuit, 2002)
Maguire Insurance Agency Inc v. Amynta Agency Inc
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Briggs v. Service Corp International
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Van Dijen v. Equifax Information Services LLC
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Reynolds v. Safeway Inc
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Ewing v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Mississippi, Inc.
(N.D. Mississippi, 2025)
Holley v. Bitesquad.com LLC
(E.D. Arkansas, 2019)
Source Credit
History
(July 30, 1947, ch. 392, 61 Stat. 671; Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1263, §19, 68 Stat. 1233.)
Editorial Notes
Derivation
Act Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §4, 43 Stat. 883.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in text, are set out in Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Amendments
1954—Act Sept. 3, 1954, brought section into conformity with present terms and practice.
Act Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §4, 43 Stat. 883.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in text, are set out in Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Amendments
1954—Act Sept. 3, 1954, brought section into conformity with present terms and practice.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 U.S.C. § 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/9/4.