FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter 20A
Unfair conduct
7 U.S.C. § 499b
Title7 — Agriculture
Chapter20A — PERISHABLE AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES
This text of 7 U.S.C. § 499b (Unfair conduct) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
7 U.S.C. § 499b.
Text
It shall be unlawful in or in connection with any transaction in interstate or foreign commerce:
(1)For any commission merchant, dealer, or broker to engage in or use any unfair, unreasonable, discriminatory, or deceptive practice in connection with the weighing, counting, or in any way determining the quantity of any perishable agricultural commodity received, bought, sold, shipped, or handled in interstate or foreign commerce.
(2)For any dealer to reject or fail to deliver in accordance with the terms of the contract without reasonable cause any perishable agricultural commodity bought or sold or contracted to be bought, sold, or consigned in interstate or foreign commerce by such dealer.
(3)For any commission merchant to discard, dump, or destroy without reasonable cause, any perisha
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Carl Norman Quinn v. Earl L. Butz, Secretary of Agriculture, and United States of America
510 F.2d 743 (D.C. Circuit, 1975)
Dole Fresh Fruit Co. v. United Banana Co., Inc., Stanton Zebroski, Raymond Zebroski and Michael Lee
821 F.2d 106 (Second Circuit, 1987)
Zwick v. Freeman
373 F.2d 110 (Second Circuit, 1967)
George Steinberg and Son, Inc. v. Earl L. Butz, Secretary of Agriculture, and United States of America
491 F.2d 988 (Second Circuit, 1974)
Finer Foods Sales Co., Inc. v. John R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture, and United States of America
708 F.2d 774 (D.C. Circuit, 1983)
Bocchi Americas Associates, Inc. v. Commerce Fresh Marketing, Inc.
515 F.3d 383 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
In Re Davis Distributors, Inc. (Two Cases). Wilson Mushroom Company v. Davis Distributors, Inc. Sovran Bank, n.a.,defendants-appellants (Two Cases)
861 F.2d 416 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)
Farley and Calfee, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
941 F.2d 964 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
Wilson v. Burch Farms, Inc.
627 S.E.2d 249 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)
Melvyn Siegel v. Richard E. Lyng, Secretary of Agriculture United States Department of Agriculture and United States of America
851 F.2d 412 (D.C. Circuit, 1988)
Bama Tomato Co. v. United States Department of Agriculture
112 F.3d 1542 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
Dell's Maraschino Cherries Co. v. Shoreline Fruit Growers, Inc.
887 F. Supp. 2d 459 (E.D. New York, 2012)
Reese Sales Company v. Clifford M. Hardin, Secretary of Agriculture
458 F.2d 183 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)
Six L's Packing Co. v. Beale
524 F. App'x 148 (Sixth Circuit, 2013)
Produce Pay, Inc. v. Izguerra Produce, Inc.
39 F.4th 1158 (Ninth Circuit, 2022)
Tom Lange Company, Incorporated v. A. Gagliano Company, Incorporated
61 F.3d 1305 (Seventh Circuit, 1995)
Melvin Beene Produce Company v. The Agricultural Marketing Service
728 F.2d 347 (Sixth Circuit, 1984)
Midland Banana & Tomato Company, Inc. Robert S. Heimann Susan Heimann v. United States Department of Agriculture
104 F.3d 139 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)
Joseph Martinelli & Co. v. Simon Siegel Co.
176 F.2d 98 (First Circuit, 1949)
Andershock's Fruitland, Inc., and James A. Andershock v. United States Department of Agriculture
151 F.3d 735 (Seventh Circuit, 1998)
Source Credit
History
(June 10, 1930, ch. 436, §2, 46 Stat. 532; Apr. 13, 1934, ch. 120, §§2, 3, 48 Stat. 585; June 19, 1936, ch. 602, §1, 49 Stat. 1533; Aug. 20, 1937, ch. 719, §§2–4, 50 Stat. 725, 726; June 29, 1940, ch. 456, §§3, 4, 54 Stat. 696; Apr. 6, 1942, ch. 211, 56 Stat. 200; July 30, 1956, ch. 786, §1, 70 Stat. 726; Pub. L. 93–369, Aug. 10, 1974, 88 Stat. 423; Pub. L. 97–352, §1, Oct. 18, 1982, 96 Stat. 1667; Pub. L. 98–273, §2, May 7, 1984, 98 Stat. 166; Pub. L. 104–48, §§9(b), 10, Nov. 15, 1995, 109 Stat. 430.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section was formerly classified to section 552 of this title.
Amendments
1995—Pub. L. 104–48, §9(b)(1), substituted "commerce:" for "commerce—" in introductory provisions.
Pars. (1) to (3). Pub. L. 104–48, §9(b)(2), substituted period for semicolon at end.
Par. (4). Pub. L. 104–48, §9(b)(2), (3), substituted period for semicolon after "section 499e(c) of this title" and inserted at end "However, this paragraph shall not be considered to make the good faith offer, solicitation, payment, or receipt of collateral fees and expenses, in and of itself, unlawful under this chapter."
Par. (5). Pub. L. 104–48, §§9(b)(2), 10, substituted "foreign commerce. However," for "foreign commerce: Provided, That", substituted period for semicolon after "miscellaneous receipts", and inserted at end "A person other than the first licensee handling misbranded perishable agricultural commodities shall not be held liable for a violation of this paragraph by reason of the conduct of another if the person did not have knowledge of the violation or lacked the ability to correct the violation."
Par. (6). Pub. L. 104–48, §9(b)(2), substituted period for semicolon at end.
1984—Par. (4). Pub. L. 98–273 inserted "or to fail to maintain the trust as required under section 499e(c) of this title;".
1982—Par. (5). Pub. L. 97–352 substituted "Provided, That any commission merchant, dealer, or broker who has violated (A) any provision of this paragraph may, with the consent of the Secretary, admit the violation or violations; or (B) any provision of this paragraph relating to a misrepresentation by mark, stencil, or label shall be permitted by the Secretary to admit the violation or violations if such violation or violations are not repeated or flagrant; and pay, in the case of a violation under either clause (A) or (B) of this paragraph," for "Provided, That any commission merchant, dealer, or broker who has violated this paragraph may, with the consent of the Secretary, admit the violation or violations and pay".
1974—Par. (5). Pub. L. 93–369 inserted proviso for consent admission of violations, payment of monetary penalty not in excess of $2,000 in lieu of formal proceedings for suspension or revocation of license, and for deposit of the payments into the Treasury of the United States as miscellaneous receipts.
1956—Par. (5). Act July 30, 1956, struck out "for a fraudulent purpose" after "broker", and included misrepresentation of region of origin.
1942—Par. (4). Act Apr. 6, 1942, inserted "and make full payment" and "or to fail, without reasonable cause, to perform any specification or duty, express or implied, arising out of any undertaking in connection with any such transaction".
1940—Par. (1). Act June 29, 1940, §3, among other changes, inserted "dealer" after "merchant".
Par. (5). Act June 29, 1940, inserted "quantity, size, pack, weight" after "quality".
1937—Par. (5). Act Aug. 20, 1937, §2, among other changes, inserted "mark, stencil, label, statement" after "act" and "the character, kind, grade, quality, condition, degree of maturity" after "or deed".
Par. (6). Act Aug. 20, 1937, §3, inserted "or in compliance with any Federal or State law or regulation" after "inspector".
Par. (7). Act Aug. 20, 1937, §4, added par. (7).
1936—Par. (4). Act June 17, 1936, struck out "or concerning the condition of the market for" after "involving".
1934—Par. (2). Act Apr. 13, 1934, §2, inserted "or consigned" after "sold".
Par. (4). Act Apr. 13, 1934, §3, substituted "in connection with any transaction involving or concerning" for "concerning the condition, quality, quantity or disposition of" and inserted "or consigned" after "contracted to be bought or sold".
Codification
Section was formerly classified to section 552 of this title.
Amendments
1995—Pub. L. 104–48, §9(b)(1), substituted "commerce:" for "commerce—" in introductory provisions.
Pars. (1) to (3). Pub. L. 104–48, §9(b)(2), substituted period for semicolon at end.
Par. (4). Pub. L. 104–48, §9(b)(2), (3), substituted period for semicolon after "section 499e(c) of this title" and inserted at end "However, this paragraph shall not be considered to make the good faith offer, solicitation, payment, or receipt of collateral fees and expenses, in and of itself, unlawful under this chapter."
Par. (5). Pub. L. 104–48, §§9(b)(2), 10, substituted "foreign commerce. However," for "foreign commerce: Provided, That", substituted period for semicolon after "miscellaneous receipts", and inserted at end "A person other than the first licensee handling misbranded perishable agricultural commodities shall not be held liable for a violation of this paragraph by reason of the conduct of another if the person did not have knowledge of the violation or lacked the ability to correct the violation."
Par. (6). Pub. L. 104–48, §9(b)(2), substituted period for semicolon at end.
1984—Par. (4). Pub. L. 98–273 inserted "or to fail to maintain the trust as required under section 499e(c) of this title;".
1982—Par. (5). Pub. L. 97–352 substituted "Provided, That any commission merchant, dealer, or broker who has violated (A) any provision of this paragraph may, with the consent of the Secretary, admit the violation or violations; or (B) any provision of this paragraph relating to a misrepresentation by mark, stencil, or label shall be permitted by the Secretary to admit the violation or violations if such violation or violations are not repeated or flagrant; and pay, in the case of a violation under either clause (A) or (B) of this paragraph," for "Provided, That any commission merchant, dealer, or broker who has violated this paragraph may, with the consent of the Secretary, admit the violation or violations and pay".
1974—Par. (5). Pub. L. 93–369 inserted proviso for consent admission of violations, payment of monetary penalty not in excess of $2,000 in lieu of formal proceedings for suspension or revocation of license, and for deposit of the payments into the Treasury of the United States as miscellaneous receipts.
1956—Par. (5). Act July 30, 1956, struck out "for a fraudulent purpose" after "broker", and included misrepresentation of region of origin.
1942—Par. (4). Act Apr. 6, 1942, inserted "and make full payment" and "or to fail, without reasonable cause, to perform any specification or duty, express or implied, arising out of any undertaking in connection with any such transaction".
1940—Par. (1). Act June 29, 1940, §3, among other changes, inserted "dealer" after "merchant".
Par. (5). Act June 29, 1940, inserted "quantity, size, pack, weight" after "quality".
1937—Par. (5). Act Aug. 20, 1937, §2, among other changes, inserted "mark, stencil, label, statement" after "act" and "the character, kind, grade, quality, condition, degree of maturity" after "or deed".
Par. (6). Act Aug. 20, 1937, §3, inserted "or in compliance with any Federal or State law or regulation" after "inspector".
Par. (7). Act Aug. 20, 1937, §4, added par. (7).
1936—Par. (4). Act June 17, 1936, struck out "or concerning the condition of the market for" after "involving".
1934—Par. (2). Act Apr. 13, 1934, §2, inserted "or consigned" after "sold".
Par. (4). Act Apr. 13, 1934, §3, substituted "in connection with any transaction involving or concerning" for "concerning the condition, quality, quantity or disposition of" and inserted "or consigned" after "contracted to be bought or sold".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 U.S.C. § 499b, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/499b.