FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—STOCKYARDS AND STOCKYARD DEALERS

Proceedings before Secretary for violations

7 U.S.C. § 210
Title7Agriculture
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—STOCKYARDS AND STOCKYARD DEALERS

This text of 7 U.S.C. § 210 (Proceedings before Secretary for violations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
7 U.S.C. § 210.

Text

(a)Complaint; response; satisfaction or investigation Any person complaining of anything done or omitted to be done by any stockyard owner, market agency, or dealer (hereinafter in this section referred to as the "defendant") in violation of the provisions of this subchapter, or of an order of the Secretary made under this subchapter, may, at any time within ninety days after the cause of action accrues, apply to the Secretary by petition which shall briefly state the facts, whereupon the complaint thus made shall be forwarded by the Secretary to the defendant, who shall be called upon to satisfy the complaint, or to answer it in writing, within a reasonable time to be specified by the Secretary. If the defendant within the time specified makes reparation for the injury alleged to be done

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society
421 U.S. 240 (Supreme Court, 1975)
4,558 case citations
Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
434 U.S. 412 (Supreme Court, 1978)
3,010 case citations
Marek v. Chesny
473 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1985)
914 case citations
Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.
386 U.S. 714 (Supreme Court, 1967)
766 case citations
Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.
341 U.S. 246 (Supreme Court, 1951)
606 case citations
Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New York
762 F.2d 243 (Second Circuit, 1985)
405 case citations
Coulter v. Tennessee
805 F.2d 146 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)
103 case citations
Washington Terminal Co. v. Boswell
124 F.2d 235 (D.C. Circuit, 1941)
86 case citations
Sandra Fulps v. The City of Springfield, Tennessee
715 F.2d 1088 (Sixth Circuit, 1983)
45 case citations
Ramos v. Lamm
539 F. Supp. 730 (D. Colorado, 1982)
27 case citations
United States v. Joey Haun
124 F.3d 745 (Sixth Circuit, 1997)
23 case citations
Wallace v. House
377 F. Supp. 1192 (W.D. Louisiana, 1974)
20 case citations
Jackson v. Swift-Eckrich
830 F. Supp. 486 (W.D. Arkansas, 1993)
9 case citations
Arnold Livestock Sales Company, Inc. v. Pearson
383 F. Supp. 1319 (D. Nebraska, 1974)
9 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title III, §309, 42 Stat. 165; Pub. L. 94–410, §3(c), Sept. 13, 1976, 90 Stat. 1249.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1976—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–410 substituted "livestock" for "live-stock" after "request of the".

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 U.S.C. § 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/210.