FEDERAL · 5 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER IV—NATIONAL SECURITY

Suspension and removal

5 U.S.C. § 7532
Title5Government Organization and Employees
ChapterSUBCHAPTER IV—NATIONAL SECURITY

This text of 5 U.S.C. § 7532 (Suspension and removal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
5 U.S.C. § 7532.

Text

(a)Notwithstanding other statutes, the head of an agency may suspend without pay an employee of his agency when he considers that action necessary in the interests of national security. To the extent that the head of the agency determines that the interests of national security permit, the suspended employee shall be notified of the reasons for the suspension. Within 30 days after the notification, the suspended employee is entitled to submit to the official designated by the head of the agency statements or affidavits to show why he should be restored to duty.
(b)Subject to subsection (c) of this section, the head of an agency may remove an employee suspended under subsection (a) of this section when, after such investigation and review as he considers necessary, he determines that remo

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sampson v. Murray
415 U.S. 61 (Supreme Court, 1974)
1,851 case citations
Department of the Navy v. Egan
484 U.S. 518 (Supreme Court, 1988)
738 case citations
Bloch v. Powell
227 F. Supp. 2d 25 (District of Columbia, 2002)
116 case citations
Rayburn F. HESSE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Respondent
217 F.3d 1372 (Federal Circuit, 2000)
80 case citations
Kaplan v. Conyers
733 F.3d 1148 (Federal Circuit, 2013)
61 case citations
John Doe v. Richard B. Cheney, Secretary of Department of Defense
885 F.2d 898 (D.C. Circuit, 1989)
46 case citations
Carlucci v. Doe
488 U.S. 93 (Supreme Court, 1988)
35 case citations
Peter J. Finley v. Robert E. Hampton
473 F.2d 180 (D.C. Circuit, 1972)
30 case citations
Elgin v. U.S. Department of the Treasury
641 F.3d 6 (First Circuit, 2011)
20 case citations
Thomas E. Egan v. Department of the Navy
802 F.2d 1563 (Federal Circuit, 1986)
16 case citations
Christian v. New York State Department of Labor, Division of Employment
347 F. Supp. 1158 (S.D. New York, 1972)
10 case citations
Berry v. Conyers
692 F.3d 1223 (Federal Circuit, 2012)
8 case citations
John C. Carr v. The United States
864 F.2d 144 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
8 case citations
National Federation of Federal Employees v. United States
695 F. Supp. 1196 (District of Columbia, 1988)
6 case citations
Mitrano v. Air Force
(Federal Circuit, 2018)
Carr v. United States
846 F.2d 144 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
AMERICAN FED. OF GOV. EMP. v. RR Retirement Bd.
742 F. Supp. 450 (N.D. Illinois, 1990)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 529.)

Editorial Notes

The application of this section is covered by the definition in section 7531.
In subsection (a), the words "Notwithstanding the provisions of section 652 of this title" are omitted but are carried into section 7501(c). The words "in his absolute discretion" are omitted as unnecessary in view of the permissive grant of authority. The word "reinstated" is omitted as it is commonly used in other statutes to denote action different from that referred to here.
In subsections (b) and (c), the words "remove" and "removal" are coextensive with and substituted for "terminate the employment", "termination", and "employment is terminated", as appropriate.
Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 U.S.C. § 7532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/5/7532.