FEDERAL · 5 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER IV—NATIONAL SECURITY
Suspension and removal
5 U.S.C. § 7532
Title5 — Government Organization and Employees
ChapterSUBCHAPTER IV—NATIONAL SECURITY
This text of 5 U.S.C. § 7532 (Suspension and removal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
5 U.S.C. § 7532.
Text
(a)Notwithstanding other statutes, the head of an agency may suspend without pay an employee of his agency when he considers that action necessary in the interests of national security. To the extent that the head of the agency determines that the interests of national security permit, the suspended employee shall be notified of the reasons for the suspension. Within 30 days after the notification, the suspended employee is entitled to submit to the official designated by the head of the agency statements or affidavits to show why he should be restored to duty.
(b)Subject to subsection (c) of this section, the head of an agency may remove an employee suspended under subsection (a) of this section when, after such investigation and review as he considers necessary, he determines that remo
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sampson v. Murray
415 U.S. 61 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Department of the Navy v. Egan
484 U.S. 518 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Bloch v. Powell
227 F. Supp. 2d 25 (District of Columbia, 2002)
Rayburn F. HESSE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Respondent
217 F.3d 1372 (Federal Circuit, 2000)
Kaplan v. Conyers
733 F.3d 1148 (Federal Circuit, 2013)
John Doe v. Richard B. Cheney, Secretary of Department of Defense
885 F.2d 898 (D.C. Circuit, 1989)
Carlucci v. Doe
488 U.S. 93 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Peter J. Finley v. Robert E. Hampton
473 F.2d 180 (D.C. Circuit, 1972)
Elgin v. U.S. Department of the Treasury
641 F.3d 6 (First Circuit, 2011)
Thomas E. Egan v. Department of the Navy
802 F.2d 1563 (Federal Circuit, 1986)
Christian v. New York State Department of Labor, Division of Employment
347 F. Supp. 1158 (S.D. New York, 1972)
Berry v. Conyers
692 F.3d 1223 (Federal Circuit, 2012)
John C. Carr v. The United States
864 F.2d 144 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
National Federation of Federal Employees v. United States
695 F. Supp. 1196 (District of Columbia, 1988)
American Federation of Government Employees v. United States Railroad Retirement Board
742 F. Supp. 450 (N.D. Illinois, 1990)
Mitrano v. Air Force
(Federal Circuit, 2018)
Carr v. United States
846 F.2d 144 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
AMERICAN FED. OF GOV. EMP. v. RR Retirement Bd.
742 F. Supp. 450 (N.D. Illinois, 1990)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 529.)
Editorial Notes
The application of this section is covered by the definition in section 7531.
In subsection (a), the words "Notwithstanding the provisions of section 652 of this title" are omitted but are carried into section 7501(c). The words "in his absolute discretion" are omitted as unnecessary in view of the permissive grant of authority. The word "reinstated" is omitted as it is commonly used in other statutes to denote action different from that referred to here.
In subsections (b) and (c), the words "remove" and "removal" are coextensive with and substituted for "terminate the employment", "termination", and "employment is terminated", as appropriate.
Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
In subsection (a), the words "Notwithstanding the provisions of section 652 of this title" are omitted but are carried into section 7501(c). The words "in his absolute discretion" are omitted as unnecessary in view of the permissive grant of authority. The word "reinstated" is omitted as it is commonly used in other statutes to denote action different from that referred to here.
In subsections (b) and (c), the words "remove" and "removal" are coextensive with and substituted for "terminate the employment", "termination", and "employment is terminated", as appropriate.
Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 U.S.C. § 7532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/5/7532.