Berry v. Conyers
This text of Berry v. Conyers (Berry v. Conyers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the FederaI Circuit JOHN BERRY, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,' Petitioner, V. RHONDA K. CONYERS AND _ DEVON HAUGHTON NORTHOVER,- Respondents, AND _ MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. 2011-3207 Petiti0n for Review of the Merit Systerns Protection Board in consolidated case nos. CHO752090925-R-1 and AT0752100184-R-1. ON MOTION ORDER The National Treasury E1np10yees Union (NTEU) moves for clarification of the due date for their brief as
BERRY V. CONYERS 2 amici curiae in support of the Respondents. Federa1 Rule of Appe]late Procedure 29(e) requires that the brief is f1led “no later than 7 days after the principal brief of the party being supported is Eled.” Upon consideration thereof, IT ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted to the extent that the court or- ders that NTEU’s brief is due no later than 7 days after the Respondents file their briefs. FOR THE COURT JAN 2 7 2012 lsi J an Horbaly Date J an Horba1y Clerk _ cc: Abby C. Wright, Esq. Andres M. Graja1es, Esq. Jeffrey A. Gauger, Esq. Gregory J. O'Duden, Esq. s24 FlLED . CUUR'T 0F APPEALS FOB u STl~lE FEDERAL ClRCUlT JAN 27 2012 JAN HORBALY CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Berry v. Conyers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berry-v-conyers-cafc-2012.