FEDERAL · 5 U.S.C. · Chapter 7
Form and venue of proceeding
5 U.S.C. § 703
Title5 — Government Organization and Employees
Chapter7 — JUDICIAL REVIEW
This text of 5 U.S.C. § 703 (Form and venue of proceeding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
5 U.S.C. § 703.
Text
The form of proceeding for judicial review is the special statutory review proceeding relevant to the subject matter in a court specified by statute or, in the absence or inadequacy thereof, any applicable form of legal action, including actions for declaratory judgments or writs of prohibitory or mandatory injunction or habeas corpus, in a court of competent jurisdiction. If no special statutory review proceeding is applicable, the action for judicial review may be brought against the United States, the agency by its official title, or the appropriate officer. Except to the extent that prior, adequate, and exclusive opportunity for judicial review is provided by law, agency action is subject to judicial review in civil or criminal proceedings for judicial enforcement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dr. Harold D. Kletschka v. William J. Driver, Individually and as Administrator of the Veterans Administration
411 F.2d 436 (Second Circuit, 1969)
Rubylee Davis, in No. 73-1249. v. George W. Romney, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in No. 73-1420
490 F.2d 1360 (Third Circuit, 1974)
Instituto De Educacion Universal Corp. v. United States Department of Education
209 F.3d 18 (First Circuit, 2000)
Estate of Watson v. Blumenthal
586 F.2d 925 (Second Circuit, 1978)
Cohen v. United States
650 F.3d 717 (D.C. Circuit, 2011)
Ralph Nader, Esquire, and Center for Auto Safety, Inc. v. John Volpe, Individually, and as Secretary of the Department of Transportation
466 F.2d 261 (D.C. Circuit, 1972)
Joseph Curran, Individually and on Behalf of All the Members of the National Maritime Union of America, Afl-Cio v. Melvin R. Laird
420 F.2d 122 (D.C. Circuit, 1969)
Carolina Environmental Study Group v. The United States of America and the United States Atomic Energy Commission, Duke Power Company, Intervenor
510 F.2d 796 (D.C. Circuit, 1975)
Wilson v. Commissioner
705 F.3d 980 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Responsibility v. Fed. Election Comm'n
892 F.3d 434 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
Arizona State Department of Public Welfare v. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Maricopa County Legal Aid Clients v. Arizona State Department of Public Welfare and Department of Health, Education and Welfare
449 F.2d 456 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)
Gardner v. Alabama
385 F.2d 804 (Fifth Circuit, 1967)
United Steelworkers of America v. Auchter
763 F.2d 728 (Third Circuit, 1985)
Jozef Sikora v. Edward J. Brenner, Commissioner of Patents
379 F.2d 134 (D.C. Circuit, 1967)
David Rettinger v. Federal Trade Commission
392 F.2d 454 (Second Circuit, 1968)
ConocoPhillips Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
612 F.3d 822 (Fifth Circuit, 2010)
Cape Fox Corp. v. United States
456 F. Supp. 784 (D. Alaska, 1978)
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 627 v. Arthurs
355 F. Supp. 7 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1973)
Nassar and Company, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Nassar and Company, Inc., and George M. Nassar v. Securities and Exchange Commission
566 F.2d 790 (D.C. Circuit, 1977)
Ohio ex rel. Celebrezze v. United States Department of Transportation
766 F.2d 228 (Sixth Circuit, 1985)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 392; Pub. L. 94–574, §1, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2721.)
Editorial Notes
Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1976—Pub. L. 94–574 provided that if no special statutory review proceeding is applicable, the action for judicial review may be brought against the United States, the agency by its official title, or the appropriate officer as defendant.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1976—Pub. L. 94–574 provided that if no special statutory review proceeding is applicable, the action for judicial review may be brought against the United States, the agency by its official title, or the appropriate officer as defendant.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 U.S.C. § 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/5/703.