FEDERAL · 5 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—EXAMINATION, CERTIFICATION, AND APPOINTMENT
Alternative ranking and selection procedures
5 U.S.C. § 3319
Title5 — Government Organization and Employees
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—EXAMINATION, CERTIFICATION, AND APPOINTMENT
This text of 5 U.S.C. § 3319 (Alternative ranking and selection procedures) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
5 U.S.C. § 3319.
Text
(a)The Office, in exercising its authority under section 3304, or an agency to which the Office has delegated examining authority under section 1104(a)(2), may establish category rating systems for evaluating applicants for positions in the competitive service, under 2 or more quality categories based on merit consistent with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, rather than assigned individual numerical ratings.
(b)Within each quality category established under subsection (a), preference-eligibles shall be listed ahead of individuals who are not preference eligibles. For other than scientific and professional positions at GS–9 of the General Schedule (equivalent or higher), qualified preference-eligibles who have a compensable service-connected disability of 10 p
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gingery v. Department of the Treasury
403 F. App'x 498 (Federal Circuit, 2010)
Donaldson v. Department of Homeland Security
528 F. App'x 986 (Federal Circuit, 2013)
Eric Williams v. Department of Defense
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022)
Sean Donahue v. Department of Labor
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022)
Gingery v. Merit Systems Protection Board
482 F. App'x 543 (Federal Circuit, 2012)
Price v. Department of Housing & Urban Development
612 F. App'x 596 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
Trimble v. DVA
(Federal Circuit, 2023)
Jerome Mansfield v. Department of Veterans Affairs
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022)
Sean Donahue v. Department of Veterans Affairs
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022)
Eric Williams v. Department of the Navy
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022)
Mr Jerome Mansfield v. Department of Veterans Affairs
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2016)
DeGerald R. Wilson v. Department of the Army
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2014)
King v. Department of Veterans Affairs
601 F. App'x 956 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 107–296, title XIII, §1312(a)(2), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2290; amended Pub. L. 114–137, §2(b), Mar. 18, 2016, 130 Stat. 311; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XI, §1107(b)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2005.)
Editorial Notes
Amendment of Section
Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XI, §1107(b)(1), (d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2005, provided that, effective on the date on which the Director of the Office of Personnel Management issues final regulations for implementation, with such regulations due not later than one year after Aug. 13, 2018, this section is amended—
(1) by amending the section heading to read as follows: "§3319. Competitive service; selection using category rating"; and
(2) in subsection (c), by striking paragraph (6), redesignating paragraph (7) as paragraph (6), and amending paragraph (6) (as so redesignated) to read as follows:
See 2018 Amendment notes below.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The General Schedule, referred to in subsec. (b), is set out under section 5332 of this title.
Prior Provisions
A prior section 3319, Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 421, related to prohibitions on employment of members of same family in the competitive service, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 95–454, title III, §307(h)(1), title IX, §907, Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1149, 1227, effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978.
Amendments
2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §1107(b)(1)(A), substituted "Competitive service; selection using category rating" for "Alternative ranking and selection procedures" in section catchline.
Subsec. (c)(6). Pub. L. 115–232, §1107(b)(1)(B), redesignated par. (7) as (6) and amended it generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2), an appointing official may not pass over a preference eligible in the same category from which selection is made, unless the requirements of section 3317(b) and 3318(c), as applicable, are satisfied."
Pub. L. 115–232, §1107(b)(1)(B), struck out par. (6). Text read as follows: "Nothing in this subsection limits any collective bargaining obligation of an agency under chapter 71."
Subsec. (c)(7). Pub. L. 115–232, §1107(b)(1)(B), redesignated par. (7) as (6).
2016—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–137 added subsec. (c) and struck out former subsec. (c) which read as follows:
"(1) An appointing official may select any applicant in the highest quality category or, if fewer than 3 candidates have been assigned to the highest quality category, in a merged category consisting of the highest and the second highest quality categories.
"(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the appointing official may not pass over a preference-eligible in the same category from which selection is made, unless the requirements of section 3317(b) or 3318(b), as applicable, are satisfied."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2018 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective on the date on which the Director of the Office of Personnel Management issues final regulations for implementation, with such regulations due not later than one year after Aug. 13, 2018, see section 1107(d) of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note under section 3317 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective 60 days after Nov. 25, 2002, see section 4 of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of Title 6, Domestic Security.
Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XI, §1107(b)(1), (d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2005, provided that, effective on the date on which the Director of the Office of Personnel Management issues final regulations for implementation, with such regulations due not later than one year after Aug. 13, 2018, this section is amended—
(1) by amending the section heading to read as follows: "§3319. Competitive service; selection using category rating"; and
(2) in subsection (c), by striking paragraph (6), redesignating paragraph (7) as paragraph (6), and amending paragraph (6) (as so redesignated) to read as follows:
See 2018 Amendment notes below.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The General Schedule, referred to in subsec. (b), is set out under section 5332 of this title.
Prior Provisions
A prior section 3319, Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 421, related to prohibitions on employment of members of same family in the competitive service, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 95–454, title III, §307(h)(1), title IX, §907, Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1149, 1227, effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978.
Amendments
2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §1107(b)(1)(A), substituted "Competitive service; selection using category rating" for "Alternative ranking and selection procedures" in section catchline.
Subsec. (c)(6). Pub. L. 115–232, §1107(b)(1)(B), redesignated par. (7) as (6) and amended it generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2), an appointing official may not pass over a preference eligible in the same category from which selection is made, unless the requirements of section 3317(b) and 3318(c), as applicable, are satisfied."
Pub. L. 115–232, §1107(b)(1)(B), struck out par. (6). Text read as follows: "Nothing in this subsection limits any collective bargaining obligation of an agency under chapter 71."
Subsec. (c)(7). Pub. L. 115–232, §1107(b)(1)(B), redesignated par. (7) as (6).
2016—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–137 added subsec. (c) and struck out former subsec. (c) which read as follows:
"(1) An appointing official may select any applicant in the highest quality category or, if fewer than 3 candidates have been assigned to the highest quality category, in a merged category consisting of the highest and the second highest quality categories.
"(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the appointing official may not pass over a preference-eligible in the same category from which selection is made, unless the requirements of section 3317(b) or 3318(b), as applicable, are satisfied."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2018 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective on the date on which the Director of the Office of Personnel Management issues final regulations for implementation, with such regulations due not later than one year after Aug. 13, 2018, see section 1107(d) of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note under section 3317 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective 60 days after Nov. 25, 2002, see section 4 of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of Title 6, Domestic Security.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 U.S.C. § 3319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/5/3319.