FEDERAL · 5 U.S.C. · Chapter 1
Independent establishment
5 U.S.C. § 104
Title5 — Government Organization and Employees
Chapter1 — ORGANIZATION
This text of 5 U.S.C. § 104 (Independent establishment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
5 U.S.C. § 104.
Text
For the purpose of this title, "independent establishment" means—
(1)an establishment in the executive branch (other than the United States Postal Service or the Postal Regulatory Commission) which is not an Executive department, military department, Government corporation, or part thereof, or part of an independent establishment; and
(2)the Government Accountability Office.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Minnie M. Honeycutt v. John E. Long, Major General Commander, Army and Air Force Exchange Service
861 F.2d 1346 (Fifth Circuit, 1988)
Bernard L. Silver, Cartwright-Mitchell, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. United States Postal Service
951 F.2d 1033 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
Mark Kroll v. United States of America and United States Postal Service
58 F.3d 1087 (Sixth Circuit, 1995)
Energy Research Foundation v. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
917 F.2d 581 (D.C. Circuit, 1990)
Sean T. Haddon v. Gary J. Walters, Chief Usher
43 F.3d 1488 (D.C. Circuit, 1995)
Peggy Maloney v. Executive Office of the President, Office of Administration
2022 MSPB 26 (Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022)
Jo A. Booker v. Merit Systems Protection Board
982 F.2d 517 (Federal Circuit, 1992)
Jephunneh Lawrence v. Elmer B. Staats
640 F.2d 427 (D.C. Circuit, 1981)
United States Department of Justice v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
39 F.3d 361 (D.C. Circuit, 1994)
Kennedy C. Scott v. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
406 F.3d 532 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
John G. Van Werry, Jr. v. Merit Systems Protection Board
995 F.2d 1048 (Federal Circuit, 1993)
Banks v. Merit Systems Protection Board
854 F.3d 1360 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
Flight International Group, Inc. v. Federal Reserve Bank
583 F. Supp. 674 (N.D. Georgia, 1984)
Eric M. Kane v. Merit Systems Protection Board
210 F.3d 1379 (Federal Circuit, 2000)
Dorsey v. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
451 F. Supp. 683 (E.D. Missouri, 1978)
Shane v. Buck
658 F. Supp. 908 (D. Utah, 1985)
Hadigian v. Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System
463 F. Supp. 437 (District of Columbia, 1978)
Katsiavelos v. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
859 F. Supp. 1183 (N.D. Illinois, 1994)
Nanfelt v. United States
1 Cl. Ct. 223 (Court of Claims, 1982)
United States v. Alexander Menendez
440 F. App'x 906 (Eleventh Circuit, 2011)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 379; Pub. L. 91–375, §6(c)(2), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 775; Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814; Pub. L. 109–435, title VI, §604(b), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3241.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
The section is supplied to avoid the necessity for defining "independent establishment" each time it is used in this title.
Certain agencies are not independent establishments under the definition since they are constituent agencies or parts of an independent establishment. However, these agencies would continue to be subject to the provisions of this title applicable to the independent establishment of which they are a constituent or part. Also, the definition does not expand or abridge any rights or authority possessed by these agencies as no substantive changes are intended, see section 7(a) of the bill.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2006—Par. (1). Pub. L. 109–435 substituted "Postal Regulatory Commission" for "Postal Rate Commission".
2004—Par. (2). Pub. L. 108–271 substituted "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office".
1970—Par. (1). Pub. L. 91–375 inserted "(other than the United States Postal Service or the Postal Rate Commission)" after "executive branch".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1970 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 91–375 effective within 1 year after Aug. 12, 1970, on date established therefor by Board of Governors of United States Postal Service and published by it in Federal Register, see section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 39, Postal Service.
The section is supplied to avoid the necessity for defining "independent establishment" each time it is used in this title.
Certain agencies are not independent establishments under the definition since they are constituent agencies or parts of an independent establishment. However, these agencies would continue to be subject to the provisions of this title applicable to the independent establishment of which they are a constituent or part. Also, the definition does not expand or abridge any rights or authority possessed by these agencies as no substantive changes are intended, see section 7(a) of the bill.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2006—Par. (1). Pub. L. 109–435 substituted "Postal Regulatory Commission" for "Postal Rate Commission".
2004—Par. (2). Pub. L. 108–271 substituted "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office".
1970—Par. (1). Pub. L. 91–375 inserted "(other than the United States Postal Service or the Postal Rate Commission)" after "executive branch".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1970 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 91–375 effective within 1 year after Aug. 12, 1970, on date established therefor by Board of Governors of United States Postal Service and published by it in Federal Register, see section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 39, Postal Service.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 U.S.C. § 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/5/104.