FEDERAL · 49 U.S.C. · Chapter 475
Limitations on recovering damages for noise
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
(a)General Limitations.—A person acquiring an interest in property after February 18, 1980, in an area surrounding an airport for which a noise exposure map has been submitted under section 47503 of this title and having actual or constructive knowledge of the existence of the map may recover damages for noise attributable to the airport only if, in addition to any other elements for recovery of damages, the person shows that—
(1)after acquiring the interest, there was a significant—
(A)change in the type or frequency of aircraft operations at the airport;
(B)change in the airport layout;
(C)change in flight patterns; or
(D)increase in nighttime operations; and
(2)the damages resulted from the change or increase.
(b)Constructive Knowledge.—Constructive knowledge of the existence of
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
49 U.S.C. § 47506 (Limitations on recovering damages for noise) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Atlanta v. Watson
475 S.E.2d 896 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Admasu v. Port of Seattle
340 P.3d 873 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2014)
Town of Hull v. Massachusetts Port Authority
806 N.E.2d 901 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2004)
Watson v. City of Atlanta
466 S.E.2d 229 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Kebede Admasu v. Port Of Seattle
(Court of Appeals of Washington, 2014)
Jimmy and Karen Lewis v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.
(Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1286.)
Editorial Notes
In subsection (a)(2), the words "for which recovery is sought have" are omitted as surplus.