FEDERAL · 49 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—REQUIREMENTS
Appeal and redress process for passengers wrongly delayed or prohibited from boarding a flight
49 U.S.C. § 44926
Title49 — Transportation
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—REQUIREMENTS
This text of 49 U.S.C. § 44926 (Appeal and redress process for passengers wrongly delayed or prohibited from boarding a flight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
49 U.S.C. § 44926.
Text
(a)In General.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish a timely and fair process for individuals who believe they have been delayed or prohibited from boarding a commercial aircraft because they were wrongly identified as a threat under the regimes utilized by the Transportation Security Administration, United States Customs and Border Protection, or any other office or component of the Department of Homeland Security.
(b)Office of Appeals and Redress.—
(1)Establishment.—The Secretary shall establish in the Department an Office of Appeals and Redress to implement, coordinate, and execute the process established by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (a). The Office shall include representatives from the Transportation Security Administration, United States Customs and Border
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Roger Vanderklok v. United States
868 F.3d 189 (Third Circuit, 2017)
Julia Shearson v. Eric Holder, Jr.
725 F.3d 588 (Sixth Circuit, 2013)
Rahinah Ibrahim v. US Dept. of Homeland Security
912 F.3d 1147 (Ninth Circuit, 2019)
Ghedi v. Mayorkas
16 F.4th 456 (Fifth Circuit, 2021)
Dustin Dyer v. Shirrellia Smith
56 F.4th 271 (Fourth Circuit, 2022)
Saeb Mokdad v. Loretta E. Lynch
804 F.3d 807 (Sixth Circuit, 2015)
Anas Elhady v. Charles Kable, IV
993 F.3d 208 (Fourth Circuit, 2021)
Ege v. United States Department of Homeland Security
784 F.3d 791 (D.C. Circuit, 2015)
Kovac v. Wray
363 F. Supp. 3d 721 (N.D. Texas, 2019)
Ancient Coin Collectors Guild v. U.S. Customs & Border Protection
801 F. Supp. 2d 383 (D. Maryland, 2011)
Shearson v. Holder
865 F. Supp. 2d 850 (N.D. Ohio, 2011)
Platsky v. National Security Agency
547 F. App'x 81 (Second Circuit, 2013)
Bibicheff v. Holder
55 F. Supp. 3d 254 (E.D. New York, 2014)
Dyer v. Smith
(E.D. Virginia, 2021)
Leuthauser v. United States of America
(D. Nevada, 2021)
Kovac v. Wray
(Fifth Circuit, 2024)
Nwaorie v. USA
(Fifth Circuit, 2023)
Long v. Lynch
(E.D. Virginia, 2020)
Abu Irshaid v. Garland
(E.D. Virginia, 2025)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 110–53, title XVI, §1606(a), Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 482; amended Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, §1991(d)(22), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3637.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002, referred to in subsec. (b)(4)(E), is title X of Pub. L. 107–296, Nov. 25, 116 Stat. 2259. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 101 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and Tables.
Amendments
2018—Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 115–254 substituted "a misidentified passenger" for "an misidentified passenger" in introductory provisions.
References in Text
The Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002, referred to in subsec. (b)(4)(E), is title X of Pub. L. 107–296, Nov. 25, 116 Stat. 2259. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 101 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and Tables.
Amendments
2018—Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 115–254 substituted "a misidentified passenger" for "an misidentified passenger" in introductory provisions.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 U.S.C. § 44926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/49/44926.