FEDERAL · 47 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—COMMON CARRIERS
Agents' acts and omissions; liability of carrier
47 U.S.C. § 217
This text of 47 U.S.C. § 217 (Agents' acts and omissions; liability of carrier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
47 U.S.C. § 217.
Text
In construing and enforcing the provisions of this chapter, the act, omission, or failure of any officer, agent, or other person acting for or employed by any common carrier or user, acting within the scope of his employment, shall in every case be also deemed to be the act, omission, or failure of such carrier or user as well as that of the person.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Charvat v. EchoStar Satellite, LLC
630 F.3d 459 (Sixth Circuit, 2010)
Uesco Industries, Inc. v. Poolman of Wisconsin, Inc.
2013 IL App (1st) 112566 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2013)
Hammann v. 1-800 Ideas. Com, Inc.
455 F. Supp. 2d 942 (D. Minnesota, 2006)
United States v. Corbin Farm Service
444 F. Supp. 510 (E.D. California, 1978)
Kleiman & Hochberg, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture
497 F.3d 681 (D.C. Circuit, 2007)
CE Design, Ltd. v. C & T Pizza, Inc.
2020 IL App (1st) 181795 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2020)
Reynolds Corp. v. National Operator Services, Inc.
73 F. Supp. 2d 299 (W.D. New York, 1999)
Charvat v. ECHOSTAR SATELLITE, LLC
676 F. Supp. 2d 668 (S.D. Ohio, 2009)
Craigville Telephone Co. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
(N.D. Illinois, 2023)
Rowan v. Pierce
(D. Puerto Rico, 2023)
Spurlark v. Dimension Service Corporation
(S.D. Ohio, 2022)
LSSI Data Corp. v. Comcast Phone, LLC
(Eleventh Circuit, 2012)
Philip Charvat v. EchoStar Satellite, LLC
(Sixth Circuit, 2010)
FDS Restaurant v. All Plumbing Inc.
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2020)
CHAMPION v. THE CREDIT PROS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
(D. New Jersey, 2022)
Isham v. United States
(Tenth Circuit, 2017)
Brodsky v. HiLine Coffee Company, Inc.
(S.D. New York, 2019)
Alvord v. Quick Fi Capital
(D. Utah, 2019)
Source Credit
History
(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title II, §217, 48 Stat. 1077.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
47 U.S.C. § 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/47/217.