FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 32

Institution of post-grant review

35 U.S.C. § 324
Title35Patents
Chapter32 — POST-GRANT REVIEW

This text of 35 U.S.C. § 324 (Institution of post-grant review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 324.

Text

(a)Threshold.—The Director may not authorize a post-grant review to be instituted unless the Director determines that the information presented in the petition filed under section 321, if such information is not rebutted, would demonstrate that it is more likely than not that at least 1 of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable.
(b)Additional Grounds.—The determination required under subsection (a) may also be satisfied by a showing that the petition raises a novel or unsettled legal question that is important to other patents or patent applications.
(c)Timing.—The Director shall determine whether to institute a post-grant review under this chapter pursuant to a petition filed under section 321 within 3 months after—
(1)receiving a preliminary response to the petition un

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Virtualagility Inc. v. salesforce.com, Inc.
759 F.3d 1307 (Federal Circuit, 2014)
144 case citations
Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.
793 F.3d 1306 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
106 case citations
Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Westlake Services
859 F.3d 1044 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
92 case citations
Blue Calypso, LLC. v. Groupon, Inc.
815 F.3d 1331 (Federal Circuit, 2016)
81 case citations
Sightsound Technologies, LLC v. Apple Inc.
809 F.3d 1307 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
50 case citations
Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corporation
878 F.3d 1364 (Federal Circuit, 2018)
35 case citations
Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service
868 F.3d 1350 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
20 case citations
Market-Alerts Pty. Ltd. v. Bloomberg Finance L.P.
922 F. Supp. 2d 486 (D. Delaware, 2013)
18 case citations
Cxloyalty, Inc. v. Maritz Holdings Inc.
986 F.3d 1367 (Federal Circuit, 2021)
15 case citations
Smartflash LLC v. Apple Inc.
621 F. App'x 995 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
12 case citations
Sipco, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co.
980 F.3d 865 (Federal Circuit, 2020)
12 case citations
Versata Development Corp. v. Rea
959 F. Supp. 2d 912 (E.D. Virginia, 2013)
7 case citations
GEA Process Engineering, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc.
618 F. App'x 667 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
3 case citations
Versata Development Group, Inc. v. Lee
793 F.3d 1352 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
3 case citations
Medtronic, Inc. v. Lee
151 F. Supp. 3d 665 (E.D. Virginia, 2016)
1 case citations
Unwired Planet, LLC v. Google Inc.
682 F. App'x 928 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
Secure Axcess, LLC v. Pnc Bank National Association
859 F.3d 998 (Federal Circuit, 2017)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 112–29, §6(d), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 306.)

Editorial Notes

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date
Section effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable only to patents described in section 3(n)(1) of Pub. L. 112–29 (35 U.S.C. 100 note), with certain exceptions and limitations, see section 6(f)(2), (3) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 321 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/324.