FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 30
Appeal
35 U.S.C. § 306
Title35 — Patents
Chapter30 — PRIOR ART CITATIONS TO OFFICE AND EX PARTE REEXAMINATION OF PATENTS
This text of 35 U.S.C. § 306 (Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 306.
Text
The patent owner involved in a reexamination proceeding under this chapter may appeal under the provisions of section 134, and may seek court review under the provisions of sections 141 to 144, with respect to any decision adverse to the patentability of any original or proposed amended or new claim of the patent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.
848 F.2d 1560 (Federal Circuit, 1988)
In Re Jerre M. Freeman
30 F.3d 1459 (Federal Circuit, 1994)
Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc.
721 F.3d 1330 (Federal Circuit, 2013)
In Re Hiniker Co.
150 F.3d 1362 (Federal Circuit, 1998)
In Re Lawrence B. Lockwood
50 F.3d 966 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
Xerox Corp. v. 3Com Corp.
69 F. Supp. 2d 404 (W.D. New York, 1999)
In Re Vamco MacHine and Tool, Inc
752 F.2d 1564 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH
271 F. Supp. 2d 64 (District of Columbia, 2002)
Syntex (u.s.a.) Inc. v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
882 F.2d 1570 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
The Boeing Company v. Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, and Cegedur Societe De Transformation De L'ALuminum Pechiney
853 F.2d 878 (Federal Circuit, 1988)
In re Teles AG Informationstechnologien
747 F.3d 1357 (Federal Circuit, 2014)
United Sweetener USA, Inc. v. Nutrasweet Co.
766 F. Supp. 212 (D. Delaware, 1991)
Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.
914 F. Supp. 951 (W.D. New York, 1996)
In Re Paul Opprecht on Motion for Reconsideration
868 F.2d 1264 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
Heinl v. Godici
143 F. Supp. 2d 593 (E.D. Virginia, 2001)
Joy Technologies, Inc. v. Manbeck
751 F. Supp. 225 (District of Columbia, 1990)
Hitachi Metals, Ltd. v. Quigg
776 F. Supp. 3 (District of Columbia, 1991)
Teles Ag v. Kappos
846 F. Supp. 2d 102 (District of Columbia, 2012)
Cooper v. Lee
86 F. Supp. 3d 480 (E.D. Virginia, 2015)
Power Integrations, Inc. v. Kappos
6 F. Supp. 3d 11 (District of Columbia, 2013)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 96–517, §1, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3016; amended Pub. L. 112–29, §§6(h)(2)(A), 20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 312, 335.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2011—Pub. L. 112–29, §20(j), struck out "of this title" after "134" and after "144".
Pub. L. 112–29, §6(h)(2)(A), substituted "144" for "145".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Pub. L. 112–29, §6(h)(2)(B), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 312, provided that: "The amendment made by this paragraph [amending this section] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 16, 2011] and shall apply to any appeal of a reexamination before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences or the Patent Trial and Appeal Board that is pending on, or brought on or after, the date of the enactment of this Act."
Amendment by section 20(j) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective July 1, 1981, and applicable to patents in force as of July 1, 1981, or issued thereafter, see section 8(b) of Pub. L. 96–517, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 41 of this title.
Amendments
2011—Pub. L. 112–29, §20(j), struck out "of this title" after "134" and after "144".
Pub. L. 112–29, §6(h)(2)(A), substituted "144" for "145".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Pub. L. 112–29, §6(h)(2)(B), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 312, provided that: "The amendment made by this paragraph [amending this section] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 16, 2011] and shall apply to any appeal of a reexamination before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences or the Patent Trial and Appeal Board that is pending on, or brought on or after, the date of the enactment of this Act."
Amendment by section 20(j) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective July 1, 1981, and applicable to patents in force as of July 1, 1981, or issued thereafter, see section 8(b) of Pub. L. 96–517, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 41 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/306.