FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 30

Appeal

Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Title 35Patents·Ch. 30 — PRIOR ART CITATIONS TO OFFICE AND EX PARTE REEXAMINATION OF PATENTS
The patent owner involved in a reexamination proceeding under this chapter may appeal under the provisions of section 134, and may seek court review under the provisions of sections 141 to 144, with respect to any decision adverse to the patentability of any original or proposed amended or new claim of the patent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

35 U.S.C. § 306 (Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.
848 F.2d 1560 (Federal Circuit, 1988)
317 case citations
In Re Jerre M. Freeman
30 F.3d 1459 (Federal Circuit, 1994)
152 case citations
Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc.
721 F.3d 1330 (Federal Circuit, 2013)
126 case citations
In Re Hiniker Co.
150 F.3d 1362 (Federal Circuit, 1998)
77 case citations
In Re Lawrence B. Lockwood
50 F.3d 966 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
36 case citations
Xerox Corp. v. 3Com Corp.
69 F. Supp. 2d 404 (W.D. New York, 1999)
29 case citations
In Re Vamco MacHine and Tool, Inc
752 F.2d 1564 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
28 case citations
Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH
271 F. Supp. 2d 64 (District of Columbia, 2002)
24 case citations
Syntex (u.s.a.) Inc. v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
882 F.2d 1570 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
20 case citations
In re Teles AG Informationstechnologien
747 F.3d 1357 (Federal Circuit, 2014)
17 case citations
United Sweetener USA, Inc. v. Nutrasweet Co.
766 F. Supp. 212 (D. Delaware, 1991)
15 case citations
Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.
914 F. Supp. 951 (W.D. New York, 1996)
8 case citations
In Re Paul Opprecht on Motion for Reconsideration
868 F.2d 1264 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
7 case citations
Heinl v. Godici
143 F. Supp. 2d 593 (E.D. Virginia, 2001)
7 case citations
Joy Technologies, Inc. v. Manbeck
751 F. Supp. 225 (District of Columbia, 1990)
6 case citations
Hitachi Metals, Ltd. v. Quigg
776 F. Supp. 3 (District of Columbia, 1991)
5 case citations
Teles Ag v. Kappos
846 F. Supp. 2d 102 (District of Columbia, 2012)
3 case citations
Cooper v. Lee
86 F. Supp. 3d 480 (E.D. Virginia, 2015)
3 case citations
Power Integrations, Inc. v. Kappos
6 F. Supp. 3d 11 (District of Columbia, 2013)
2 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 96–517, §1, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3016; amended Pub. L. 112–29, §§6(h)(2)(A), 20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 312, 335.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2011—Pub. L. 112–29, §20(j), struck out "of this title" after "134" and after "144".
Pub. L. 112–29, §6(h)(2)(A), substituted "144" for "145".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Pub. L. 112–29, §6(h)(2)(B), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 312, provided that: "The amendment made by this paragraph [amending this section] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 16, 2011] and shall apply to any appeal of a reexamination before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences or the Patent Trial and Appeal Board that is pending on, or brought on or after, the date of the enactment of this Act."
Amendment by section 20(j) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

Effective Date
Section effective July 1, 1981, and applicable to patents in force as of July 1, 1981, or issued thereafter, see section 8(b) of Pub. L. 96–517, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 41 of this title.