FEDERAL · 33 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—GRANTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TREATMENT WORKS
Plans, specifications, estimates, and payments
33 U.S.C. § 1283
Title33 — Navigation and Navigable Waters
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—GRANTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TREATMENT WORKS
This text of 33 U.S.C. § 1283 (Plans, specifications, estimates, and payments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
33 U.S.C. § 1283.
Text
(a)Submission; contractual nature of approval by Administrator; agreement on eligible costs; single grant
(1)Each applicant for a grant shall submit to the Administrator for his approval, plans, specifications, and estimates for each proposed project for the construction of treatment works for which a grant is applied for under section 1281(g)(1) of this title from funds allotted to the State under section 1285 of this title and which otherwise meets the requirements of this chapter. The Administrator shall act upon such plans, specifications, and estimates as soon as practicable after the same have been submitted, and his approval of any such plans, specifications, and estimates shall be deemed a contractual obligation of the United States for the payment of its proportional contributio
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Train v. City of New York
420 U.S. 35 (Supreme Court, 1975)
United States v. City of Detroit v. County of Muskegon, Intervenor-Appellant
720 F.2d 443 (Sixth Circuit, 1983)
City of Manassas Park v. United States
633 F.2d 181 (Court of Claims, 1980)
County of Suffolk v. United States
36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,793 (Court of Claims, 1990)
CCTW&M v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region II
452 F. Supp. 69 (D. New Jersey, 1978)
Chesapeake Bay Village, Inc. v. Costle
502 F. Supp. 213 (D. Maryland, 1980)
City of Wheeling v. United States
20 Cl. Ct. 659 (Court of Claims, 1990)
Heart of the Valley Metropolitan Sewerage District v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
532 F. Supp. 314 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1981)
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. United States
48 Fed. Cl. 785 (Federal Claims, 2001)
Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District v. Thomas
668 F. Supp. 1427 (E.D. California, 1987)
Evansville Cement Finishers, Inc. v. Village of New Haven
766 F. Supp. 692 (S.D. Illinois, 1991)
Town of Fallsburg v. United States
22 Cl. Ct. 633 (Court of Claims, 1991)
Pennbank v. United States
599 F. Supp. 1573 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1985)
Cole County Regional Sewer District v. United States
22 Cl. Ct. 551 (Court of Claims, 1991)
City of New Haven v. Train
424 F. Supp. 648 (D. Connecticut, 1976)
BSP Division of Envirotech Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
471 F. Supp. 958 (D. New Jersey, 1979)
Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District v. Reilly
905 F.2d 1262 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)
Sarasota v. Environmental Protection Agency
799 F.2d 674 (Eleventh Circuit, 1986)
Town of Floyd v. United States
40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,875 (Federal Claims, 1995)
Louisiana Delta Service Corps v. Corporation for National and Community Service
(M.D. Louisiana, 2025)
Source Credit
History
(June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title II, §203, as added Pub. L. 92–500, §2, Oct. 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 835; amended Pub. L. 93–243, §2, Jan. 2, 1974, 87 Stat. 1069; Pub. L. 95–217, §§18, 19, Dec. 27, 1977, 91 Stat. 1571, 1572; Pub. L. 96–483, §6, Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2362; Pub. L. 97–117, §9, Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1626; Pub. L. 100–4, title II, §§203, 204, Feb. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 16, 17.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1987—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–4, §203, designated provision relating to submission of plans, specifications, and estimates, and provision relating to contractual nature of approval by Administrator as par. (1), designated provision relating to requirements for awarding single grant for combined Federal share of cost of preparing plans and specifications, and building and erection of treatment works as par. (3), and added par. (2).
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 100–4, §204, added subsec. (f).
1981—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–117 substituted "$8,000,000" for "$4,000,000" and struck out provision that, if any State is found by the Administrator to have unusually high costs of construction, the Administrator may authorize a single grant where the estimated total cost of the treatment works does not exceed $5,000,000.
1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–483 substituted "$4,000,000" and "$5,000,000" for "$2,000,000" and "$3,000,000", respectively.
1977—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 95–217, §18, provided that, in the case of a treatment works that has an estimated total cost of $2,000,000 or less (as determined by the Administrator), and the population of the applicant municipality is twenty-five thousand or less (according to the most recent United States census), upon completion of an approved facility plan, a single grant may be awarded for the combined Federal share of the cost of preparing construction plans and specifications, and the building and erection of the treatment works, and that, if any State is found by the Administrator to have unusually high costs of construction, the Administrator may authorize a single grant where the estimated total cost of the treatment works does not exceed $3,000,000.
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 95–217, §19, added subsec. (e).
1974—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 93–243 added subsec. (d).
Amendments
1987—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–4, §203, designated provision relating to submission of plans, specifications, and estimates, and provision relating to contractual nature of approval by Administrator as par. (1), designated provision relating to requirements for awarding single grant for combined Federal share of cost of preparing plans and specifications, and building and erection of treatment works as par. (3), and added par. (2).
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 100–4, §204, added subsec. (f).
1981—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–117 substituted "$8,000,000" for "$4,000,000" and struck out provision that, if any State is found by the Administrator to have unusually high costs of construction, the Administrator may authorize a single grant where the estimated total cost of the treatment works does not exceed $5,000,000.
1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–483 substituted "$4,000,000" and "$5,000,000" for "$2,000,000" and "$3,000,000", respectively.
1977—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 95–217, §18, provided that, in the case of a treatment works that has an estimated total cost of $2,000,000 or less (as determined by the Administrator), and the population of the applicant municipality is twenty-five thousand or less (according to the most recent United States census), upon completion of an approved facility plan, a single grant may be awarded for the combined Federal share of the cost of preparing construction plans and specifications, and the building and erection of the treatment works, and that, if any State is found by the Administrator to have unusually high costs of construction, the Administrator may authorize a single grant where the estimated total cost of the treatment works does not exceed $3,000,000.
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 95–217, §19, added subsec. (e).
1974—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 93–243 added subsec. (d).
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
33 U.S.C. § 1283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/33/1283.