FEDERAL · 31 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—ADMINISTRATIVE

Practice before the Department

31 U.S.C. § 330
Title31Money and Finance
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—ADMINISTRATIVE

This text of 31 U.S.C. § 330 (Practice before the Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
31 U.S.C. § 330.

Text

(a)Subject to section 500 of title 5, the Secretary of the Treasury may—
(1)regulate the practice of representatives of persons before the Department of the Treasury; and
(2)before admitting a representative to practice, require that the representative demonstrate—
(A)good character;
(B)good reputation;
(C)necessary qualifications to enable the representative to provide to persons valuable service; and
(D)competency to advise and assist persons in presenting their cases.
(b)Any enrolled agents properly licensed to practice as required under rules promulgated under subsection (a) shall be allowed to use the credentials or designation of "enrolled agent", "EA", or "E.A.".
(c)After notice and opportunity for a proceeding, the Secretary may suspend or disbar from practice before the D

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Loving v. Internal Revenue Service
742 F.3d 1013 (D.C. Circuit, 2014)
77 case citations
John Bowman, Jr. v. Kimberly Iddon
848 F.3d 1034 (D.C. Circuit, 2017)
36 case citations
Robert Kenny v. United States
489 F. App'x 628 (Third Circuit, 2012)
19 case citations
Loving v. Internal Revenue Service
917 F. Supp. 2d 67 (District of Columbia, 2013)
14 case citations
United States v. Elsass
978 F. Supp. 2d 901 (S.D. Ohio, 2013)
12 case citations
Hubbard v. United States
545 F. Supp. 2d 1 (District of Columbia, 2008)
8 case citations
Ridgely, Jr v. Geithner
55 F. Supp. 3d 89 (District of Columbia, 2014)
6 case citations
Steele v. United States
260 F. Supp. 3d 52 (District of Columbia, 2017)
6 case citations
Wright v. Everson
543 F.3d 649 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
4 case citations
Bowman v. Iddon
138 F. Supp. 3d 3 (D.C. Circuit, 2015)
3 case citations
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants v. Internal Revenue Service
199 F. Supp. 3d 55 (District of Columbia, 2016)
1 case citations
Brady v. ades/esa Tax Unit
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2023)
Bowman, Jr. v. Iddon
(District of Columbia, 2015)
Sicignano v. United States
127 F. Supp. 2d 325 (D. Connecticut, 2001)
Cave Buttes, L.L.C. v. Comm'r
147 T.C. No. 10 (U.S. Tax Court, 2016)
Richard I. Presley & Martine N. Presley v. Commissioner
2018 T.C. Memo. 171 (U.S. Tax Court, 2018)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 884; Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title I, §156(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 695; Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095; Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, §822(a)(1), (b), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1586, 1587; Pub. L. 109–280, title XII, §1219(d), Aug. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 1085; Pub. L. 114–113, div. Q, title IV, §410, Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 3121.)

Editorial Notes

In the section, the words "representatives of persons" are substituted for "agents, attorneys, or other persons representing claimants before his department" to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (a), before clause (1), the words "Subject to section 500 of title 5" are added for clarity and to conform to title 5. In clause (1), the word "regulate" is substituted for "prescribe rules and regulations" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "the practice" are substituted for "before being recognized" for consistency with other revised titles of the United States Code. In clause (2)(C), the words "possessed of the" are omitted because of the restatement.
In subsection (b), the word "proceeding" is substituted for "hearing" because of subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5. In clause (3), the words "violates regulations prescribed under this section" are substituted for "who refuses to comply with said rules and regulations" to eliminate unnecessary words. In clause (4), the words "in any manner" are omitted as surplus. The word "deceive" is omitted as being included in the word "mislead". The words "by word, circular, letter, or by advertisement" are omitted as unnecessary.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2015—Subsecs. (b) to (e). Pub. L. 114–113 added subsec. (b) and redesignated former subsecs. (b) to (d) as (c) to (e), respectively.
2006—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 109–280 struck out "with respect to whom a penalty has been assessed under section 6701(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986" after "any appraiser" in introductory provisions.
2004—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 108–357, §822(a)(1), inserted ", or censure," after "Department" in introductory provisions and inserted at end "The Secretary may impose a monetary penalty on any representative described in the preceding sentence. If the representative was acting on behalf of an employer or any firm or other entity in connection with the conduct giving rise to such penalty, the Secretary may impose a monetary penalty on such employer, firm, or entity if it knew, or reasonably should have known, of such conduct. Such penalty shall not exceed the gross income derived (or to be derived) from the conduct giving rise to the penalty and may be in addition to, or in lieu of, any suspension, disbarment, or censure of the representative."
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 108–357, §822(b), added subsec. (d).
1986—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 99–514 substituted "Internal Revenue Code of 1986" for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954".
1984—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 98–369 added subsec. (c).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2006 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–280 applicable to appraisals prepared with respect to returns or submissions filed after Aug. 17, 2006, see section 1219(e)(2) of Pub. L. 109–280, set out as a note under section 170 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

Effective Date of 2004 Amendment
Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, §822(a)(2), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1587, provided that: "The amendments made by this subsection [amending this section] shall apply to actions taken after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 22, 2004]."

Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title I, §156(b), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 695, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply to penalties assessed after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 18, 1984]."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 U.S.C. § 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/31/330.