FEDERAL · 31 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—APPORTIONMENT
Apportionment and reserves
31 U.S.C. § 1512
Title31 — Money and Finance
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—APPORTIONMENT
This text of 31 U.S.C. § 1512 (Apportionment and reserves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
31 U.S.C. § 1512.
Text
(a)Except as provided in this subchapter, an appropriation available for obligation for a definite period shall be apportioned to prevent obligation or expenditure at a rate that would indicate a necessity for a deficiency or supplemental appropriation for the period. An appropriation for an indefinite period and authority to make obligations by contract before appropriations shall be apportioned to achieve the most effective and economical use. An apportionment may be reapportioned under this section.
(b)(1) An appropriation subject to apportionment is apportioned by—
(A)months, calendar quarters, operating seasons, or other time periods;
(B)activities, functions, projects, or objects; or
(C)a combination of the ways referred to in clauses (A) and (B) of this paragraph.
(2)The offici
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
The Cessna Aircraft Company v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of Navy
126 F.3d 1442 (Federal Circuit, 1998)
Policy & Research, LLC v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.
313 F. Supp. 3d 62 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
Rogers v. United States
14 Cl. Ct. 39 (Court of Claims, 1987)
City of New Haven v. United States
809 F.2d 900 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
Byrd v. Raines
956 F. Supp. 25 (District of Columbia, 1997)
Furash & Co. v. United States
46 Fed. Cl. 518 (Federal Claims, 2000)
City of New Haven, Connecticut v. United States
634 F. Supp. 1449 (District of Columbia, 1986)
Maryland Department of Human Resources, Ruth W. Massinga, Secretary v. Department of Health and Human Services, Otis R. Bowen, Secretary
854 F.2d 40 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)
Obligating Carryover Funds in Violation of OMB Zero-Dollar Apportionment Rule
(Office of Legal Counsel, 2016)
National Endowment for Democracy v. United States of America
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Office of Management and Budget
(D.C. Circuit, 2025)
Applicability of the Antideficiency Act to a Violation of a Condition or Internal Cap Within an Appropriation
(Office of Legal Counsel, 2001)
United States Marshals Service Obligation to Take Steps to Avoid Anticipated Appropriations Deficiency
(Office of Legal Counsel, 1999)
Global Health Council v. Donald J. Trump (AMENDED OPINION)
(D.C. Circuit, 2025)
Protect Democracy Project v. U.S. Office of Management and Budget
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Global Health Council v. Donald J. Trump
(D.C. Circuit, 2025)
American Center for International Labor Solidarity v. Chavez-Deremer
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Policy and Research, LLC v. Department of Health and Human Services
(District of Columbia, 2018)
Vera Institute of Justice v. U.S. Department of Justice
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Center for Public Integrity v. U.S. Department of Defense
(District of Columbia, 2020)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 929.)
Editorial Notes
In subsection (a), the word "appropriation" is substituted for "appropriations or funds" because of the definition of "appropriation" in section 1511 of the revised title. The words "at a rate" are substituted for "in a manner" for clarity. The words "indefinite period" are substituted for "not limited to a definite period of time" for consistency in the revised title. The words "An apportionment may be reapportioned under this section" are substituted for 31:665(c)(4)(words after 1st comma) to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (b)(1), before clause (A), the word "apportioned" is substituted for "distributed" for consistency in the revised section.
In subsections (b)(2) and (d), the word "official" is substituted for "officer" for consistency in the revised title.
In subsection (c)(1)(C), the words "by law" are substituted for "by particular appropriation Acts or other laws" to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (c)(2), the words "appropriation requests" are substituted for "estimates of appropriations" for consistency with chapter 11 of the revised title.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Impoundment Control Act of 1974, referred to in subsec. (c)(2), is parts A and B of title X of Pub. L. 93–344, July 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 332, which is classified principally to subchapters I (§681) and II (§682 et seq.) of chapter 17B of Title 2, The Congress. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 681 of Title 2 and Tables.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Apportionment of Funds Appropriated to District of Columbia Government
Pub. L. 100–202, §101(c) [title I, §135], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–90, 1329–102, provided that: "Federal funds hereafter appropriated to the District of Columbia government shall not be subject to apportionment except to the extent specifically provided by statute."
In subsection (b)(1), before clause (A), the word "apportioned" is substituted for "distributed" for consistency in the revised section.
In subsections (b)(2) and (d), the word "official" is substituted for "officer" for consistency in the revised title.
In subsection (c)(1)(C), the words "by law" are substituted for "by particular appropriation Acts or other laws" to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (c)(2), the words "appropriation requests" are substituted for "estimates of appropriations" for consistency with chapter 11 of the revised title.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Impoundment Control Act of 1974, referred to in subsec. (c)(2), is parts A and B of title X of Pub. L. 93–344, July 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 332, which is classified principally to subchapters I (§681) and II (§682 et seq.) of chapter 17B of Title 2, The Congress. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 681 of Title 2 and Tables.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Apportionment of Funds Appropriated to District of Columbia Government
Pub. L. 100–202, §101(c) [title I, §135], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–90, 1329–102, provided that: "Federal funds hereafter appropriated to the District of Columbia government shall not be subject to apportionment except to the extent specifically provided by statute."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
31 U.S.C. § 1512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/31/1512.