FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter 14
Criminal penalties
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Whoever shall forcibly resist, oppose, impede, intimidate or interfere with a duly authorized representative of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission while it is engaged in the performance of duties under this chapter shall be punished by a fine of not more than $500 or by imprisonment for not more than one year, or by both: Provided, however, That no person shall be imprisoned under this section except when there has been a prior conviction hereunder.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
29 U.S.C. § 629 (Criminal penalties) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lorillard v. Pons
434 U.S. 575 (Supreme Court, 1978)
William L. Clark v. Resistoflex Company, a Division of Unidynamics Corporation and Its Successor Crane Resistoflex Company, a Division of Crane Co.
854 F.2d 762 (Fifth Circuit, 1988)
Trachtenberg v. Department of Education
937 F. Supp. 2d 460 (S.D. New York, 2013)
Xuelin Zhuang v. Datacard Corporation
414 F.3d 849 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
Schreiber v. WORLDCO, LLC
324 F. Supp. 2d 512 (S.D. New York, 2004)
In Re Paolino
71 B.R. 576 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1987)
McConnell v. Thomson Newspapers, Inc.
802 F. Supp. 1484 (E.D. Texas, 1992)
Golden v. McDermott, Will & Emery
702 N.E.2d 581 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1998)
Moorehead v. New York City Transit Authority
385 F. Supp. 2d 248 (S.D. New York, 2005)
National Community Reinvestment Coalition v. Accredited Home Lenders Holding Co.
573 F. Supp. 2d 70 (District of Columbia, 2008)
Hassan v. Delta Orthopedic Medical Group, Inc.
476 F. Supp. 1063 (E.D. California, 1979)
Daniels v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
797 F. Supp. 2d 1163 (D. Kansas, 2011)
Elliott v. British Tourist Authority
172 F. Supp. 2d 395 (S.D. New York, 2001)
Neely v. Miller Brewing Co.
25 F. App'x 370 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)
State Police for Automatic Retirement Ass'n v. Difava
138 F. Supp. 2d 142 (D. Massachusetts, 2001)
Curtis v. University of Houston
940 F. Supp. 1070 (S.D. Texas, 1996)
McNulty v. New York City Department of Finance
45 F. Supp. 2d 296 (S.D. New York, 1999)
McCombs v. Federal Express Corp.
965 F. Supp. 2d 1018 (N.D. Indiana, 2013)
STATE POLICE FOR AUTOMATIC RETIREMENT v. Difava
138 F. Supp. 2d 142 (D. Massachusetts, 2001)
Martel v. Great Bend Borough
40 F. Supp. 2d 261 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1999)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 90–202, §10, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 605; 1978 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §2, eff. Jan. 1, 1979, 43 F.R. 19807, 92 Stat. 3781.)
Editorial Notes
Executive Documents
Transfer of Functions
"Equal Employment Opportunity Commission" and "it" substituted in text for "Secretary", meaning Secretary of Labor, and "he", respectively, pursuant to Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1978, §2, 43 F.R. 19807, 92 Stat. 3781, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, which transferred all functions vested by this section in Secretary of Labor to Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, effective Jan. 1, 1979, as provided by section 1–101 of Ex. Ord. No. 12106, Dec. 28, 1978, 44 F.R. 1053.
Transfer of Functions
"Equal Employment Opportunity Commission" and "it" substituted in text for "Secretary", meaning Secretary of Labor, and "he", respectively, pursuant to Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1978, §2, 43 F.R. 19807, 92 Stat. 3781, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, which transferred all functions vested by this section in Secretary of Labor to Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, effective Jan. 1, 1979, as provided by section 1–101 of Ex. Ord. No. 12106, Dec. 28, 1978, 44 F.R. 1053.