FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter 14
Study by Secretary of Labor; reports to President and Congress; scope of study; implementation of study; transmittal date of reports
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
(a)(1) The Secretary of Labor is directed to undertake an appropriate study of institutional and other arrangements giving rise to involuntary retirement, and report his findings and any appropriate legislative recommendations to the President and to the Congress. Such study shall include—
(B)a determination of the feasibility of eliminating such limitation;
(C)a determination of the feasibility of raising such limitation above 70 years of age; and
(D)an examination of the effect of the exemption contained in section 631(c) of this title, relating to certai
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
29 U.S.C. § 624 (Study by Secretary of Labor; reports to President and Congress; scope of study; implementation of study; transmittal date of reports) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anzaldua v. Band
578 N.W.2d 306 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1998)
Palmer v. Ticcione
576 F.2d 459 (Second Circuit, 1978)
Jerome W. HARPRING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL OIL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
628 F.2d 406 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
Lynch v. JP Stevens & Co., Inc.
758 F. Supp. 976 (D. New Jersey, 1991)
Garcia v. Newtown Township
819 F. Supp. 2d 416 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2011)
19 Fair empl.prac.cas. 321, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8314 Lois Palmer v. Frank Ticcione, Howard Hayes, Benjamin Giambabio, William O'connell, William Gargiulo, Robert Jacob, N. Paul Buscemi, and the School Board of the Copiague Union Free School District 5
576 F.2d 459 (Second Circuit, 1978)
Estevez v. Power
(D. Nevada, 2024)
Boyd v. K-VA-T Food Stores, Inc.
(W.D. Virginia, 2021)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 90–202, §5, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 604; Pub. L. 95–256, §6, Apr. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 192.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Section 3(a) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments of 1978, referred to in subsec. (a)(1)(A), is section 3(a) of Pub. L. 95–256, Apr. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 189, which amended section 631 of this title.
Amendments
1978—Pub. L. 95–256 designated existing provisions as par. (1), added cls. (A) to (D), added par. (2), and added subsec. (b).
Study To Analyze Potential Consequences of Elimination of Mandatory Retirement on Institutions of Higher Education
Pub. L. 99–592, §6(c), Oct. 31, 1986, 100 Stat. 3344, required the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, not later than 12 months after Oct. 31, 1986, to enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences for the conduct of a study to analyze the potential consequences of the elimination of mandatory retirement on institutions of higher education and to report the results of the study, with recommendations, to the President and to Congress not later than 5 years after Oct. 31, 1986.
References in Text
Section 3(a) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments of 1978, referred to in subsec. (a)(1)(A), is section 3(a) of Pub. L. 95–256, Apr. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 189, which amended section 631 of this title.
Amendments
1978—Pub. L. 95–256 designated existing provisions as par. (1), added cls. (A) to (D), added par. (2), and added subsec. (b).
Study To Analyze Potential Consequences of Elimination of Mandatory Retirement on Institutions of Higher Education
Pub. L. 99–592, §6(c), Oct. 31, 1986, 100 Stat. 3344, required the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, not later than 12 months after Oct. 31, 1986, to enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences for the conduct of a study to analyze the potential consequences of the elimination of mandatory retirement on institutions of higher education and to report the results of the study, with recommendations, to the President and to Congress not later than 5 years after Oct. 31, 1986.