FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LEAVE
Certification
29 U.S.C. § 2613
This text of 29 U.S.C. § 2613 (Certification) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
29 U.S.C. § 2613.
Text
(a)In general
An employer may require that a request for leave under subparagraph (C) or (D) of paragraph (1) or paragraph (3) of section 2612(a) of this title be supported by a certification issued by the health care provider of the eligible employee or of the son, daughter, spouse, or parent of the employee, or of the next of kin of an individual in the case of leave taken under such paragraph (3), as appropriate. The employee shall provide, in a timely manner, a copy of such certification to the employer.
(b)Sufficient certification
Certification provided under subsection (a) shall be sufficient if it states—
(1)the date on which the serious health condition commenced;
(2)the probable duration of the condition;
(3)the appropriate medical facts within the knowledge of the health car
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Michael Woods v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation
409 F.3d 984 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
Gale Edgar v. Jac Products, Inc.
443 F.3d 501 (Sixth Circuit, 2006)
Penny Bachelder Mark Bachelder v. America West Airlines, Inc.
259 F.3d 1112 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Robert Drago v. Ken Jenne
453 F.3d 1301 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
David W. Callison v. City of Philadelphia
430 F.3d 117 (Third Circuit, 2005)
Jackie Killian v. Yorozu Automotive Tennessee, Inc.
454 F.3d 549 (Sixth Circuit, 2006)
Linda K. Brumbalough v. Camelot Care Centers, Inc.
427 F.3d 996 (Sixth Circuit, 2005)
Alfredo Diaz v. Fort Wayne Foundry Corporation
131 F.3d 711 (Seventh Circuit, 1997)
Peter J. Kauffman v. Federal Express Corporation
426 F.3d 880 (Seventh Circuit, 2005)
Blakley v. Schlumberger Technology Corp.
648 F.3d 921 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
Lynn Hoffman v. Professional Med Team, a Michigan Corporation
394 F.3d 414 (Sixth Circuit, 2005)
Farhner v. United Transportation Union Discipline Income Protection Program
645 F.3d 338 (Sixth Circuit, 2011)
Debbie Stekloff v. St. John's Mercy Health Systems
218 F.3d 858 (Eighth Circuit, 2000)
Murphy v. FedEx National LTL, Inc.
618 F.3d 893 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
McGregor Ex Rel. Bankruptcy Estate of Cox v. AutoZone, Inc.
180 F.3d 1305 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
Charles S. Sorrell, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Rinker Materials Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
395 F.3d 332 (Sixth Circuit, 2005)
Carol A. Brown v. Trans World Airlines Donald Oldt Trudy Rousch-Heywood
127 F.3d 337 (Fourth Circuit, 1997)
Millicent Bailey v. Southwest Gas Company
275 F.3d 1181 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Tayag v. Lahey Clinic Hospital, Inc.
632 F.3d 788 (First Circuit, 2011)
Medley v. Polk Company
260 F.3d 1202 (Tenth Circuit, 2001)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 103–3, title I, §103, Feb. 5, 1993, 107 Stat. 11; Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title V, §585(a)(3)(E), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 130; Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title V, §565(a)(1)(C), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2310.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2009—Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 111–84 substituted "covered active duty" for "active duty" in two places in heading.
2008—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–181, §585(a)(3)(E)(i), substituted "paragraph (1) or paragraph (3) of section 2612(a)" for "section 2612(a)(1)" and inserted "or of the next of kin of an individual in the case of leave taken under such paragraph (3)," after "parent of the employee,".
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 110–181, §585(a)(3)(E)(ii), added subsec. (f).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective 6 months after Feb. 5, 1993, except that, in the case of collective bargaining agreements in effect on that effective date, section applicable on the earlier of (1) the date of termination of such agreement, or (2) the date that occurs 12 months after Feb. 5, 1993, see section 405(b) of Pub. L. 103–3, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
Amendments
2009—Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 111–84 substituted "covered active duty" for "active duty" in two places in heading.
2008—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–181, §585(a)(3)(E)(i), substituted "paragraph (1) or paragraph (3) of section 2612(a)" for "section 2612(a)(1)" and inserted "or of the next of kin of an individual in the case of leave taken under such paragraph (3)," after "parent of the employee,".
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 110–181, §585(a)(3)(E)(ii), added subsec. (f).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective 6 months after Feb. 5, 1993, except that, in the case of collective bargaining agreements in effect on that effective date, section applicable on the earlier of (1) the date of termination of such agreement, or (2) the date that occurs 12 months after Feb. 5, 1993, see section 405(b) of Pub. L. 103–3, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 U.S.C. § 2613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/29/2613.