FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter 9

Relief from liability and punishment under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, the Walsh-Healey Act, and the Bacon-Davis Act for failure to pay minimum wage or overtime compensation

29 U.S.C. § 254
Title29Labor
Chapter9 — PORTAL-TO-PORTAL PAY

This text of 29 U.S.C. § 254 (Relief from liability and punishment under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, the Walsh-Healey Act, and the Bacon-Davis Act for failure to pay minimum wage or overtime compensation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
29 U.S.C. § 254.

Text

(a)Activities not compensable Except as provided in subsection (b), no employer shall be subject to any liability or punishment under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended [29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], the Walsh-Healey Act, or the Bacon-Davis Act,1 on account of the failure of such employer to pay an employee minimum wages, or to pay an employee overtime compensation, for or on account of any of the following activities of such employee engaged in on or after May 14, 1947—
(1)walking, riding, or traveling to and from the actual place of performance of the principal activity or activities which such employee is employed to perform, and
(2)activities which are preliminary to or postliminary to said principal activity or activities, which occur either prior to the time on any particu

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Aztec Well Servicing Co.
462 F.3d 1274 (Tenth Circuit, 2006)
75 case citations
Bamonte v. City of Mesa
598 F.3d 1217 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
65 case citations
Reich v. IBP, Inc.
38 F.3d 1123 (Tenth Circuit, 1994)
55 case citations
Perez v. City of New York
832 F.3d 120 (Second Circuit, 2016)
12 case citations
Gerber Products Co. v. Hewitt
2016 Ark. 222 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2016)
10 case citations
Brock v. Two "R" Drilling Co.
789 F.2d 1177 (Fifth Circuit, 1986)
10 case citations
Cooley v. HMR of Alabama, Inc.
259 F. Supp. 3d 1312 (N.D. Alabama, 2017)
5 case citations
Amaya v. DGS Construction LLC
246 A.3d 616 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2021)
2 case citations
Rodney Tyger v. Precision Drilling Corp
78 F.4th 587 (Third Circuit, 2023)
1 case citations
Sanford v. Preferred Staffing Inc
(E.D. Wisconsin, 2020)
Hallman v. Peco Foods Inc
(E.D. Arkansas, 2022)
Heimbach, Aplts. v. Amazon.com
(Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2021)
Robert B. Reich v. Rich Kramer
(Eighth Circuit, 1998)
Rutti v. Lojack Corporation
(Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Aitken v. United States
(Federal Claims, 2022)
Hatcher v. Hines
(E.D. Virginia, 2025)

Source Credit

History

(May 14, 1947, ch. 52, §4, 61 Stat. 86; Pub. L. 104–188, [title II], §2102, Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1928.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (d), is act June 25, 1938, ch. 676, 52 Stat. 1060, which is classified generally to chapter 8 (§201 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 201 of this title and Tables.
The Walsh-Healey and Bacon-Davis Acts, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (d), are defined for purposes of this chapter in section 262 of this title.

Amendments
1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–188 in closing provisions inserted at end "For purposes of this subsection, the use of an employer's vehicle for travel by an employee and activities performed by an employee which are incidental to the use of such vehicle for commuting shall not be considered part of the employee's principal activities if the use of such vehicle for travel is within the normal commuting area for the employer's business or establishment and the use of the employer's vehicle is subject to an agreement on the part of the employer and the employee or representative of such employee."

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Pub. L. 104–188, [title II], §2103, Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1928, provided that: "The amendment made by section 2101 [probably means section 2102 of Pub. L. 104–188, amending this section] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 20, 1996] and shall apply in determining the application of section 4 of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 [this section] to an employee in any civil action brought before such date of enactment but pending on such date."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 U.S.C. § 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/29/254.