FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER V—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Private right of action

29 U.S.C. § 1854
Title29Labor
SubtitleF
ChapterSUBCHAPTER V—GENERAL PROVISIONS
PartA

This text of 29 U.S.C. § 1854 (Private right of action) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
29 U.S.C. § 1854.

Text

(a)Maintenance of civil action in district court by aggrieved person Any person aggrieved by a violation of this chapter or any regulation under this chapter by a farm labor contractor, agricultural employer, agricultural association, or other person may file suit in any district court of the United States having jurisdiction of the parties, without respect to the amount in controversy and without regard to the citizenship of the parties and without regard to exhaustion of any alternative administrative remedies provided herein.
(b)Appointment of attorney and commencement of action Upon application by a complainant and in such circumstances as the court may deem just, the court may appoint an attorney for such complainant and may authorize the commencement of the action.
(c)Award of dam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co.
176 L. Ed. 2d 311 (Supreme Court, 2010)
583 case citations
Adams Fruit Co. v. Barrett
494 U.S. 638 (Supreme Court, 1990)
318 case citations
Raygor v. Regents of the University of Minnesota
534 U.S. 533 (Supreme Court, 2000)
283 case citations
Beaudry v. TeleCheck Services, Inc.
579 F.3d 702 (Sixth Circuit, 2009)
46 case citations
Barbara Rush v. Kilolo Kijakazi
65 F.4th 114 (Fourth Circuit, 2023)
31 case citations
De Leon-Granados v. Eller and Sons Trees, Inc.
497 F.3d 1214 (Eleventh Circuit, 2007)
27 case citations
Luc Chery v. Gordon Bowman, Ii, D/B/A Mount Clifton Fruit Company
901 F.2d 1053 (Eleventh Circuit, 1990)
25 case citations
Martinez-Mendoza v. Champion International Corp.
340 F.3d 1200 (Eleventh Circuit, 2003)
24 case citations
Leyva v. Buley
125 F.R.D. 512 (E.D. Washington, 1989)
23 case citations
John Schlueter v. Edward Latek
683 F.3d 350 (Seventh Circuit, 2012)
20 case citations
Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. Norton
389 F.3d 1074 (Tenth Circuit, 2004)
19 case citations
Dagoberto Morante-Navarro v. T&Y Pine Straw, Inc.
350 F.3d 1163 (Eleventh Circuit, 2003)
19 case citations
Mont v. United States
587 U.S. 514 (Supreme Court, 2019)
15 case citations
Saintida v. Tyre, L.
783 F. Supp. 1368 (S.D. Florida, 1992)
15 case citations
Escobar v. Baker
814 F. Supp. 1491 (W.D. Washington, 1993)
14 case citations
Saur v. Snappy Apple Farms, Inc.
203 F.R.D. 281 (W.D. Michigan, 2001)
9 case citations
United States Ex Rel. Anthony v. Burke Engineering Co.
356 F. Supp. 2d 1119 (C.D. California, 2005)
9 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 97–470, title V, §504, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2597; Pub. L. 102–392, title III, §325(a), Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1728; Pub. L. 104–49, §§1(a)(2), 2(a), 3, Nov. 15, 1995, 109 Stat. 432, 433.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1995—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 104–49, §1(a)(2), amended subsec. (d) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (d) read as follows:
"(d)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, where a State workers' compensation law is applicable and coverage is provided for a migrant or seasonal agricultural worker, the workers' compensation benefits shall be the exclusive remedy for loss of such worker under this chapter in the case of bodily injury or death.
"(2) The exclusive remedy prescribed by paragraph (1) precludes the recovery under subsection (c) of actual damages for loss from an injury or death but does not preclude recovery under subsection (c) for statutory damages or an injunction."
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 104–49, §2(a), added subsec. (e).
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 104–49, §3, added subsec. (f).
1992—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 102–392 added subsec. (d).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1995 Amendment
Pub. L. 104–49, §1(b), Nov. 15, 1995, 109 Stat. 432, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a)(2) [amending this section] shall apply to all cases in which a final judgment has not been entered."
Pub. L. 104–49, §2(b), Nov. 15, 1995, 109 Stat. 433, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply to all cases in which a final judgment has not been entered."

Effective Date of 1992 Amendment
Pub. L. 102–392, title III, §325(c), Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1728, provided that the amendment of this section by section 325(a) of Pub. L. 102–392 would apply to actions commenced after Oct. 6, 1992, but not after the expiration of 9 months after such date, with waiver and extension provisions for certain actions, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–49, §1(a)(1), Nov. 15, 1995, 109 Stat. 432.

Effective Date
Section effective 90 days from Jan. 14, 1983, see section 524 of Pub. L. 97–470, set out as a note under section 1801 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 U.S.C. § 1854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/29/1854.