FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—PLAN TERMINATION INSURANCE
Complete withdrawal
29 U.S.C. § 1383
Title29 — Labor
SubtitleE
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—PLAN TERMINATION INSURANCE
Partpart 1—employer withdrawals
This text of 29 U.S.C. § 1383 (Complete withdrawal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
29 U.S.C. § 1383.
Text
(a)Determinative factors
For purposes of this part, a complete withdrawal from a multiemployer plan occurs when an employer—
(1)permanently ceases to have an obligation to contribute under the plan, or
(2)permanently ceases all covered operations under the plan.
(b)Building and construction industry
(1)Notwithstanding subsection (a), in the case of an employer that has an obligation to contribute under a plan for work performed in the building and construction industry, a complete withdrawal occurs only as described in paragraph (2), if—
(A)substantially all the employees with respect to whom the employer has an obligation to contribute under the plan perform work in the building and construction industry, and
(B)the plan—
(i)primarily covers employees in the building and construct
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co.
484 U.S. 539 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Trustees of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund v. McFarlin's, Inc.
789 F.2d 98 (Second Circuit, 1986)
Louis F. Peick v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
724 F.2d 1247 (Seventh Circuit, 1983)
IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. Barker & Williamson, Inc.
788 F.2d 118 (Third Circuit, 1986)
Republic Industries, Inc. v. Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund
693 F.2d 290 (Third Circuit, 1982)
Hop Energy, L.L.C. v. Local 553 Pension Fund
678 F.3d 158 (Second Circuit, 2012)
UFCW Local One Pension Fund v. Enivel Properties, LLC
791 F.3d 369 (Second Circuit, 2015)
Coles Express v. New England Teamsters & Trucking Industry Pension Fund
702 F. Supp. 355 (D. Maine, 1988)
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Creative Development Co.
232 F.3d 406 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
Connors v. Brady-Cline Coal Co.
668 F. Supp. 5 (District of Columbia, 1987)
Woodward Sand Company, Inc., and Sorrento Sand Company, Inc., Plaintiffs v. The Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund
789 F.2d 691 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Manhattan Ford Lincoln, Inc. v. UAW Local 259 Pension Fund
331 F. Supp. 3d 365 (D. New Jersey, 2018)
Construction Laborers Pension Trust v. Cen-Vi-Ro Concrete Pipe & Products Company, Inc.
776 F.2d 1416 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
Transport Motor Express, Inc., E.W. Bohren Transport, Inc., and Essex Group, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund
724 F.2d 575 (Seventh Circuit, 1983)
Trustees Of The Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers And Warehouse Workers Union (Independent) Pension Fund v. Rentar Industries, Incorporated
951 F.2d 152 (Seventh Circuit, 1991)
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Robinson Cartage Co.
55 F.3d 1318 (Seventh Circuit, 1995)
Local 705 International Brothe v. Anthony Pitello
3 F.4th 949 (Seventh Circuit, 2021)
Trustees of the United Mine Workers 1974 Pension Plan v. Morrison Knudsen Corp.
931 F. Supp. 4 (District of Columbia, 1996)
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Art Pape Transfer, Inc.
881 F. Supp. 1168 (N.D. Illinois, 1995)
Technical Metallurgical Services, Inc. v. Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund
213 F. App'x 268 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 93–406, title IV, §4203, as added Pub. L. 96–364, title I, §104(2), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1218.)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 U.S.C. § 1383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/29/1383.