FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RIGHTS
Mergers and consolidations of plans or transfers of plan assets
29 U.S.C. § 1058
Title29 — Labor
SubtitleB
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RIGHTS
Partpart 2—participation and vesting
This text of 29 U.S.C. § 1058 (Mergers and consolidations of plans or transfers of plan assets) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
29 U.S.C. § 1058.
Text
A pension plan may not merge or consolidate with, or transfer its assets or liabilities to, any other plan after September 2, 1974, unless each participant in the plan would (if the plan then terminated) receive a benefit immediately after the merger, consolidation, or transfer which is equal to or greater than the benefit he would have been entitled to receive immediately before the merger, consolidation, or transfer (if the plan had then terminated). The preceding sentence shall not apply to any transaction to the extent that participants either before or after the transaction are covered under a multiemployer plan to which subchapter III of this chapter applies.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Paulsen v. CNF INC.
559 F.3d 1061 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Donovan v. Bierwirth
680 F.2d 263 (Second Circuit, 1982)
Eckert v. Titan Tire Corp.
514 F.3d 801 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)
United Steelworkers of America, Local 2116, Russell Whisman, Darrell Tucker, G.R. Jones, and David Jewell v. Cyclops Corporation
860 F.2d 189 (Sixth Circuit, 1988)
Carol Harley v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Carol Harley v. Guillo Agostini
284 F.3d 901 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)
Sengpiel v. B.F. Goodrich Co.
156 F.3d 660 (Sixth Circuit, 1998)
Kinek v. Paramount Communications, Inc.
22 F.3d 503 (Second Circuit, 1994)
Pens. Plan Guide P 23884y Jan C. Harms, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Crossappellants v. Cavenham Forest Industries, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross
984 F.2d 686 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)
Koch Industries, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Sun Company, Inc., Cross-Appellees, and Champlin Refining & Chemicals, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Appellee
918 F.2d 1203 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)
Jamal Kifafi v. Hilton Hotel Retirement Plan
701 F.3d 718 (D.C. Circuit, 2012)
Michael R. King, Mark D. Urbanski, Donald E. Renfro v. National Human Resource Committee, Inc.
218 F.3d 719 (Seventh Circuit, 2000)
Shaver v. Siemens Corp.
670 F.3d 462 (Third Circuit, 2012)
Robert H. Dougherty v. Chrysler Motors Corporation
840 F.2d 2 (Sixth Circuit, 1988)
Warrick v. General Electric Co.
70 F.3d 736 (Second Circuit, 1995)
Pilkington PLC v. Perelman
72 F.3d 1396 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
John Blair Communications, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan v. Telemundo Group, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
26 F.3d 360 (Second Circuit, 1994)
Blaw Knox Retirement Income Plan v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.
998 F.2d 1185 (Third Circuit, 1993)
Evelyn JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
648 F.2d 225 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
Hickerson v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.
778 F.2d 365 (Seventh Circuit, 1985)
Malia v. General Electric Company
23 F.3d 828 (Third Circuit, 1994)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 93–406, title I, §208, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 865; Pub. L. 96–364, title IV, §402(b)(1), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1299.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1980—Pub. L. 96–364 substituted provisions respecting applicability of preceding sentence to transactions under a covered multiemployer plan to which subchapter III applies, for provisions relating to applicability of paragraph to a multiemployer plan only to extent determined by Corporation.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–364 effective Sept. 26, 1980, except as specifically provided, see section 1461(e) of this title.
Amendments
1980—Pub. L. 96–364 substituted provisions respecting applicability of preceding sentence to transactions under a covered multiemployer plan to which subchapter III applies, for provisions relating to applicability of paragraph to a multiemployer plan only to extent determined by Corporation.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–364 effective Sept. 26, 1980, except as specifically provided, see section 1461(e) of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 U.S.C. § 1058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/29/1058.