FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter 6

Nonenforceability of undertakings in conflict with public policy; "yellow dog" contracts

29 U.S.C. § 103
Title29Labor
Chapter6 — JURISDICTION OF COURTS IN MATTERS AFFECTING EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE

This text of 29 U.S.C. § 103 (Nonenforceability of undertakings in conflict with public policy; "yellow dog" contracts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
29 U.S.C. § 103.

Text

Any undertaking or promise, such as is described in this section, or any other undertaking or promise in conflict with the public policy declared in section 102 of this title, is declared to be contrary to the public policy of the United States, shall not be enforceable in any court of the United States and shall not afford any basis for the granting of legal or equitable relief by any such court, including specifically the following: Every undertaking or promise hereafter made, whether written or oral, express or implied, constituting or contained in any contract or agreement of hiring or employment between any individual, firm, company, association, or corporation, and any employee or prospective employee of the same, whereby

(a)Either party to such contract or agreement undertakes or p

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC
327 P.3d 129 (California Supreme Court, 2014)
600 case citations
Sheila Warnock SEUS, Appellant, v. JOHN NUVEEN & CO., INC.
146 F.3d 175 (Third Circuit, 1998)
177 case citations
Retail Clerks Union Local 1222, Afl-Cio v. Alfred M. Lewis, Inc.
327 F.2d 442 (Ninth Circuit, 1964)
39 case citations
Brady v. National Football League
644 F.3d 661 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
30 case citations
Ryan v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
924 F. Supp. 2d 559 (S.D. New York, 2013)
29 case citations
Morvant v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
870 F. Supp. 2d 831 (N.D. California, 2012)
27 case citations
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hay Associates
545 F. Supp. 1064 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1982)
19 case citations
Totten v. Kellogg Brown & Root, LLC
152 F. Supp. 3d 1243 (C.D. California, 2016)
16 case citations
Bell v. Chase Manhattan Bank Ex Rel. Chase Manhattan Bank
40 F. Supp. 2d 307 (Virgin Islands, 1999)
10 case citations
Davis v. Henry
555 So. 2d 457 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1990)
9 case citations
Gerosa v. Savasta
189 F. Supp. 2d 137 (S.D. New York, 2002)
5 case citations
Town of New Roads v. Dukes
312 So. 2d 890 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1975)
3 case citations
Sperry Gyroscope Co. v. Hall
185 F. Supp. 64 (S.D. New York, 1960)
1 case citations
National Labor Relations Board v. Bratten Pontiac Corp.
406 F.2d 349 (Fourth Circuit, 1969)
1 case citations
Iskanian v. CLS Transportation
(California Supreme Court, 2014)

Source Credit

History

(Mar. 23, 1932, ch. 90, §3, 47 Stat. 70.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 U.S.C. § 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/29/103.