FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 171
Judgment as bar
28 U.S.C. § 2676
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter171 — TORT CLAIMS PROCEDURE
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 2676 (Judgment as bar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 2676.
Text
The judgment in an action under section 1346(b) of this title shall constitute a complete bar to any action by the claimant, by reason of the same subject matter, against the employee of the government whose act or omission gave rise to the claim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Barbara P. Hutchinson v. United States of America
838 F.2d 390 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Brownback v. King
592 U.S. 209 (Supreme Court, 2021)
Norman Birnbaum, B. Leonard Avery and Mary Rule MacMillen Plaintiffs v. United States
588 F.2d 319 (Second Circuit, 1978)
Michalik v. Hermann
422 F.3d 252 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
Fifyne Henderson v. Major George Bluemink
511 F.2d 399 (D.C. Circuit, 1974)
Jose Serra, Cross-Appellant v. Paul A. Pichardo, Cross-Appellee, Robert Elsea, Defendant-Cross-Appellee
786 F.2d 237 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)
Sammy J. Vantrease v. United States
400 F.2d 853 (Sixth Circuit, 1968)
Denson v. United States
574 F.3d 1318 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)
Robert Arevalo v. Chuck Woods
811 F.2d 487 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Lorna Kreines v. United States of America, and Jack McMenimen Wayne Yamashita
959 F.2d 834 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Manning v. United States
546 F.3d 430 (Seventh Circuit, 2008)
Jose Piedad Sanchez v. Bill Rowe, in His Individual and Official Capacities as a U.S. Border Patrol Agent
870 F.2d 291 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)
Thomas E. Engle v. Officer Craig Mecke, General Services Administration United States of America
24 F.3d 133 (Tenth Circuit, 1994)
Lois Munson v. United States of America, D. James Munson v. United States
380 F.2d 976 (Sixth Circuit, 1967)
SolarCity Corp. v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District
859 F.3d 720 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Hoosier Bancorp of Indiana, Inc. v. Rasmussen
90 F.3d 180 (Seventh Circuit, 1996)
Marvin R. Ray v. United States
228 F.2d 574 (Fifth Circuit, 1956)
Government Employees Insurance Co. v. James A. Ziarno, Edward T. Chamberlain and American Fidelity Fire Insurance Co.
273 F.2d 645 (Second Circuit, 1960)
Richmond Hilton Associates v. City of Richmond
690 F.2d 1086 (Fourth Circuit, 1982)
Domingos v. United States
883 F. Supp. 16 (E.D. North Carolina, 1993)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 984.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §931(b) (Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, §410(b), 60 Stat. 844).
Section constitutes the first sentence of section 931(b) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Other provisions of such section 931(b) are incorporated in section 2675 of this title.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Senate Revision Amendment
This section was eliminated by Senate amendment. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §931(b) (Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, §410(b), 60 Stat. 844).
Section constitutes the first sentence of section 931(b) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Other provisions of such section 931(b) are incorporated in section 2675 of this title.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Senate Revision Amendment
This section was eliminated by Senate amendment. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 2676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/2676.