FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 114

Coupon settlements

28 U.S.C. § 1712

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1712 (Coupon settlements) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1712.

Text

(a)Contingent Fees in Coupon Settlements.—If a proposed settlement in a class action provides for a recovery of coupons to a class member, the portion of any attorney's fee award to class counsel that is attributable to the award of the coupons shall be based on the value to class members of the coupons that are redeemed.
(b)Other Attorney's Fee Awards in Coupon Settlements.—
(1)In general.—If a proposed settlement in a class action provides for a recovery of coupons to class members, and a portion of the recovery of the coupons is not used to determine the attorney's fee to be paid to class counsel, any attorney's fee award shall be based upon the amount of time class counsel reasonably expended working on the action.
(2)Court approval.—Any attorney's fee under this subsection shall b

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sarah Murphy v. Sfbsc Management, LLC
944 F.3d 1035 (Ninth Circuit, 2019)
184 case citations
Jane Doe v. Deja Vu Consulting, Inc.
925 F.3d 886 (Sixth Circuit, 2019)
77 case citations
In re Toys "R" US-Delaware, Inc.
295 F.R.D. 438 (C.D. California, 2014)
70 case citations
In Re New Mexico Indirect Purchasers Microsoft Corp.
2007 NMCA 007 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2006)
64 case citations
Masters v. Wilhelmina Model Agency, Inc.
473 F.3d 423 (Second Circuit, 2007)
53 case citations
Chavez v. Netflix, Inc.
75 Cal. Rptr. 3d 413 (California Court of Appeal, 2008)
53 case citations
Radosti v. Envision Emi, LLC
717 F. Supp. 2d 37 (District of Columbia, 2010)
45 case citations
McAtee v. Capital One, F.S.B.
479 F.3d 1143 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
21 case citations
Chakejian v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
275 F.R.D. 201 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2011)
16 case citations
Berkson v. Gogo LLC
147 F. Supp. 3d 123 (E.D. New York, 2015)
7 case citations
Seegert v. Lamps Plus, Inc.
377 F. Supp. 3d 1127 (S.D. California, 2018)
2 case citations
Thomas Riva v. Pella Corporation
(Seventh Circuit, 2014)
Drazen v. Godaddy.com,LLC
(S.D. Alabama, 2025)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 109–2, §3(a), Feb. 18, 2005, 119 Stat. 6.)

Editorial Notes

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date
Section applicable to any civil action commenced on or after Feb. 18, 2005, see section 9 of Pub. L. 109–2, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 1332 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1712.