FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 87

Multidistrict litigation

Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Title 28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure·Ch. 87 — DISTRICT COURTS; VENUE
(a)When civil actions involving one or more common questions of fact are pending in different districts, such actions may be transferred to any district for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Such transfers shall be made by the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation authorized by this section upon its determination that transfers for such proceedings will be for the convenience of parties and witnesses and will promote the just and efficient conduct of such actions. Each action so transferred shall be remanded by the panel at or before the conclusion of such pretrial proceedings to the district from which it was transferred unless it shall have been previously terminated: Provided, however, That the panel may separate any claim, cross-claim, counter-claim, or third-part

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

28 U.S.C. § 1407 (Multidistrict litigation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re: Sealed Case
141 F.3d 337 (D.C. Circuit, 1998)
63 case citations
Young v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, Inc.
688 A.2d 1069 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1997)
60 case citations
Helfand v. Cenco, Inc.
80 F.R.D. 1 (N.D. Illinois, 1977)
38 case citations
In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Tires Products Liability Litigation
205 F.R.D. 503 (S.D. Indiana, 2001)
19 case citations
In re Aqua Dots Products Liability Litigation
270 F.R.D. 377 (N.D. Illinois, 2010)
16 case citations
Donahue v. Far Eastern Air Transport Corp.
652 F.2d 1032 (D.C. Circuit, 1981)
14 case citations
Athens-Clarke County Unified Government v. Federal Housing Finance Agency
945 F. Supp. 2d 1401 (M.D. Georgia, 2013)
6 case citations
Crescenta Valley Water District v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
269 F.R.D. 360 (S.D. New York, 2010)
4 case citations
LONG v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES
1999 NCBC 10 (North Carolina Business Court, 1999)
3 case citations
Nisbett v. Bridgestone Corp.
203 F. Supp. 2d 1032 (S.D. Indiana, 2002)
3 case citations
Midland v. F. Hoffman-Laroche, Ltd.
270 F. Supp. 2d 15 (District of Columbia, 2003)
3 case citations
In re Nissan Motor Corporation Antitrust Litigation
82 F.R.D. 193 (S.D. Florida, 1979)
2 case citations
In Re Ford Motor Co.
591 F.3d 406 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
1 case citations
Medinger v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
667 F. App'x 321 (Second Circuit, 2016)
1 case citations
AstraZeneca AB v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, LLC
329 F. Supp. 2d 1368 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2004)
1 case citations
Lee v. Macatawa Bank Corp.
493 F. Supp. 2d 1381 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2007)
1 case citations
Thomas v. Andersen
227 F. Supp. 2d 1389 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2002)
1 case citations
Hammonds v. Bayer AG
269 F. Supp. 2d 1376 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2003)
1 case citations
Galvanizers Co. v. Noranda, Inc.
270 F. Supp. 2d 1379 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2003)
1 case citations
Dabon v. GlaxoSmithKline, Inc.
528 F. Supp. 2d 1339 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2007)
1 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 90–296, §1, Apr. 29, 1968, 82 Stat. 109; amended Pub. L. 94–435, title III, §303, Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1396; Pub. L. 117–328, div. GG, title III, §301, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5970.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (f), are set out in the Appendix to this title.

Amendments
2022—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 117–328, §301(1), inserted "or a State" after "United States" and struck out "; but shall not include section 4A of the Act of October 15, 1914, as added July 7, 1955 (69 Stat. 282; 15 U.S.C. 15a)" before period at end.
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 117–328, §301(2), struck out subsec. (h) which read as follows: "Notwithstanding the provisions of section 1404 or subsection (f) of this section, the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation may consolidate and transfer with or without the consent of the parties, for both pretrial purposes and for trial, any action brought under section 4C of the Clayton Act."
1976—Pub. L. 94–435 added subsec. (h).