FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 87
Multidistrict litigation
28 U.S.C. § 1407
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter87 — DISTRICT COURTS; VENUE
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1407 (Multidistrict litigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1407.
Text
(a)When civil actions involving one or more common questions of fact are pending in different districts, such actions may be transferred to any district for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Such transfers shall be made by the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation authorized by this section upon its determination that transfers for such proceedings will be for the convenience of parties and witnesses and will promote the just and efficient conduct of such actions. Each action so transferred shall be remanded by the panel at or before the conclusion of such pretrial proceedings to the district from which it was transferred unless it shall have been previously terminated: Provided, however, That the panel may separate any claim, cross-claim, counter-claim, or third-part
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re: Sealed Case
141 F.3d 337 (D.C. Circuit, 1998)
Young v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, Inc.
688 A.2d 1069 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1997)
Helfand v. Cenco, Inc.
80 F.R.D. 1 (N.D. Illinois, 1977)
In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Tires Products Liability Litigation
205 F.R.D. 503 (S.D. Indiana, 2001)
In re Aqua Dots Products Liability Litigation
270 F.R.D. 377 (N.D. Illinois, 2010)
Donahue v. Far Eastern Air Transport Corp.
652 F.2d 1032 (D.C. Circuit, 1981)
Athens-Clarke County Unified Government v. Federal Housing Finance Agency
945 F. Supp. 2d 1401 (M.D. Georgia, 2013)
Crescenta Valley Water District v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
269 F.R.D. 360 (S.D. New York, 2010)
LONG v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES
1999 NCBC 10 (North Carolina Business Court, 1999)
Nisbett v. Bridgestone Corp.
203 F. Supp. 2d 1032 (S.D. Indiana, 2002)
Midland v. F. Hoffman-Laroche, Ltd.
270 F. Supp. 2d 15 (District of Columbia, 2003)
In re Nissan Motor Corporation Antitrust Litigation
82 F.R.D. 193 (S.D. Florida, 1979)
In Re Ford Motor Co.
591 F.3d 406 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
Medinger v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
667 F. App'x 321 (Second Circuit, 2016)
AstraZeneca AB v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, LLC
329 F. Supp. 2d 1368 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2004)
Lee v. Macatawa Bank Corp.
493 F. Supp. 2d 1381 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2007)
Thomas v. Andersen
227 F. Supp. 2d 1389 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2002)
Hammonds v. Bayer AG
269 F. Supp. 2d 1376 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2003)
Galvanizers Co. v. Noranda, Inc.
270 F. Supp. 2d 1379 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2003)
Dabon v. GlaxoSmithKline, Inc.
528 F. Supp. 2d 1339 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2007)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 90–296, §1, Apr. 29, 1968, 82 Stat. 109; amended Pub. L. 94–435, title III, §303, Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1396; Pub. L. 117–328, div. GG, title III, §301, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5970.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (f), are set out in the Appendix to this title.
Amendments
2022—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 117–328, §301(1), inserted "or a State" after "United States" and struck out "; but shall not include section 4A of the Act of October 15, 1914, as added July 7, 1955 (69 Stat. 282; 15 U.S.C. 15a)" before period at end.
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 117–328, §301(2), struck out subsec. (h) which read as follows: "Notwithstanding the provisions of section 1404 or subsection (f) of this section, the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation may consolidate and transfer with or without the consent of the parties, for both pretrial purposes and for trial, any action brought under section 4C of the Clayton Act."
1976—Pub. L. 94–435 added subsec. (h).
References in Text
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (f), are set out in the Appendix to this title.
Amendments
2022—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 117–328, §301(1), inserted "or a State" after "United States" and struck out "; but shall not include section 4A of the Act of October 15, 1914, as added July 7, 1955 (69 Stat. 282; 15 U.S.C. 15a)" before period at end.
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 117–328, §301(2), struck out subsec. (h) which read as follows: "Notwithstanding the provisions of section 1404 or subsection (f) of this section, the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation may consolidate and transfer with or without the consent of the parties, for both pretrial purposes and for trial, any action brought under section 4C of the Clayton Act."
1976—Pub. L. 94–435 added subsec. (h).
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1407.