FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 85

Internal revenue; customs duties

28 U.S.C. § 1340
Title28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter85 — DISTRICT COURTS; JURISDICTION

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1340 (Internal revenue; customs duties) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1340.

Text

The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress providing for internal revenue, or revenue from imports or tonnage except matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baird v. Koerner
279 F.2d 623 (Ninth Circuit, 1960)
215 case citations
United States v. James R. Coson
286 F.2d 453 (Ninth Circuit, 1961)
84 case citations
Shaw v. United States
331 F.2d 493 (Ninth Circuit, 1964)
51 case citations
Alexander v. United States
44 F.3d 328 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
49 case citations
United States v. Lowell G. Anderson
584 F.2d 369 (Tenth Circuit, 1978)
46 case citations
State v. Radzvilowicz
703 A.2d 767 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1997)
36 case citations
Walthall v. United States
131 F.3d 1289 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
32 case citations
Berman v. United States
264 F.3d 16 (First Circuit, 2001)
21 case citations
Bullock v. Latham
306 F.2d 45 (Second Circuit, 1962)
16 case citations
United States v. Avila
88 F.3d 229 (Third Circuit, 1996)
16 case citations
Your Insurance Needs Agency Inc. v. United States
274 F.3d 1001 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
12 case citations
Hanhauser v. United States
85 F.R.D. 89 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1979)
11 case citations
United States v. Jack Cozza, Inc.
106 F.R.D. 264 (S.D. New York, 1985)
9 case citations
Pittsburgh National Bank v. United States
498 F. Supp. 101 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1980)
8 case citations
Bobo v. Christus Health
227 F.R.D. 479 (E.D. Texas, 2005)
7 case citations
Hastings v. United States
279 F. Supp. 13 (N.D. California, 1967)
6 case citations
Rio Farms, Inc. v. Scofield
103 F. Supp. 515 (W.D. Texas, 1952)
5 case citations
Drake v. United States
355 F. Supp. 710 (E.D. Missouri, 1973)
4 case citations
Curtis Publishing Co. v. Smith
124 F. Supp. 508 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1954)
4 case citations
United States v. Charles Weiss
52 F.4th 546 (Third Circuit, 2022)
4 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 932; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, §501(21), Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1742.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(5) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 5, 36 Stat. 1092; Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 488, §1, 45 Stat. 1475).
Words "Customs Court" were substituted for "Court of Customs and Patent Appeals." Section 41(5) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., is based on the Judicial Code of 1911. At that time the only court, other than the district courts, having jurisdiction of customs cases, was the Court of Customs Appeals which became the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in 1929. The Customs Court was created in 1926 as a court of original jurisdiction over customs cases. (See reviser's note preceding section 251 of this title.)
Words "any civil action" were substituted for "all cases" in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Changes were made in phraseology.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1980—Pub. L. 96–417 redesignated the Customs Court as the Court of International Trade.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 effective Nov. 1, 1980, and applicable with respect to civil actions pending on or commenced on or after such date, see section 701(a) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1340.