FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—GENERALLY
Jurisdiction of New York State courts in civil actions
25 U.S.C. § 233
Title25 — Indians
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—GENERALLY
This text of 25 U.S.C. § 233 (Jurisdiction of New York State courts in civil actions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
25 U.S.C. § 233.
Text
The courts of the State of New York under the laws of such State shall have jurisdiction in civil actions and proceedings between Indians or between one or more Indians and any other person or persons to the same extent as the courts of the State shall have jurisdiction in other civil actions and proceedings, as now or hereafter defined by the laws of such State: Provided, That the governing body of any recognized tribe of Indians in the State of New York shall have the right to declare, by appropriate enactment prior to September 13, 1952, those tribal laws and customs which they desire to preserve, which, on certification to the Secretary of the Interior by the governing body of such tribe shall be published in the Federal Register and thereafter shall govern in all civil cases involving
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida
414 U.S. 661 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Countyof Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of NY
470 U.S. 226 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation
439 U.S. 463 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian Nation
362 U.S. 99 (Supreme Court, 1960)
Dana Leigh Thompson v. County of Franklin, William A. Hughes, Treasurer of Franklin County
15 F.3d 245 (Second Circuit, 1994)
City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of NY
544 U.S. 197 (Supreme Court, 2005)
South Carolina v. Catawba Indian Tribe, Inc.
476 U.S. 498 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Ransom v. St. Regis Mohawk Education & Community Fund, Inc.
658 N.E.2d 989 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Mohegan Tribe v. State of Conn.
528 F. Supp. 1359 (D. Connecticut, 1982)
Seneca v. Seneca
293 A.D.2d 56 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Alexander v. Hart
64 A.D.3d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Bowen v. Doyle
230 F.3d 525 (Second Circuit, 2000)
People v. Snyder
141 Misc. 2d 444 (New York County Courts, 1988)
Oneida Indian Nation of New York State v. County of Oneida
464 F.2d 916 (Second Circuit, 1972)
Maurice John, a Native American and Member of the Seneca Nation of Indians v. City of Salamanca and Norris Stone
845 F.2d 37 (Second Circuit, 1988)
Oneida Indian Nation v. Burr
132 A.D.2d 402 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
New York ex rel. Abrams v. Anderson
671 F. Supp. 220 (W.D. New York, 1987)
Snyder v. Abrams
214 A.D.2d 991 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
State of New York v. Shinnecock Indian Nation
701 F.3d 101 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Source Credit
History
(Sept. 13, 1950, ch. 947, §1, 64 Stat. 845.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Act Sept. 13, 1950, ch. 947, §2, 64 Stat. 846, provided: "This Act [this section] shall take effect two years after the date of its passage [Sept. 13, 1950]."
Effective Date
Act Sept. 13, 1950, ch. 947, §2, 64 Stat. 846, provided: "This Act [this section] shall take effect two years after the date of its passage [Sept. 13, 1950]."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 U.S.C. § 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/25/233.