Snyder v. Abrams

214 A.D.2d 991, 626 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6732
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 28, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s action on the ground that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs action is within the contemplation of 25 USC § 233 and Indian Law § 5, which give State courts jurisdiction over private civil litigation between Indians to the same extent as courts have jurisdiction in other civil actions and proceedings (see, People v [992]*992Anderson, 137 AD2d 259, 270; Oneida Indian Nation v Burr, 132 AD2d 402; Matter of Jimerson v Halftown Estate, 22 AD2d 417). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—Dismiss Complaint.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snyder v. Abrams, 214 A.D.2d 991, 626 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6732 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

214 A.D.2d 991 (Snyder v. Abrams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alexander v. Hart
64 A.D.3d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)